The aim of this work is to study the chemical and functional characterization of balsamic vinegar of Modena (BVM) and traditional balsamic vinegars from Modena (TBVM), using different methods to assay the phenolic content and the antioxidant activity. Besides, NMR analysis was used to obtain information about the principal substances in the samples. One hundred and nine samples of both TBVM and BVM were analyzed in all. Despite the observed high intragroup variability, the statistical analysis showed statistically significant differences between TBVM and BVM. The TBVMs are richer in phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins and show higher antioxidant capacity than BVMs. The general discriminant analysis (GDA) model including all the compositional and NMR data was able to group the samples according to the type of vinegar. The first canonical discriminant function explains 92.2 % of the total variance, and the leave-one out cross-validation show a predictive capacity of 89.6 %.
Antioxidant Activity, Phenolic Compounds, and NMR Characterization of Balsamic and Traditional Balsamic Vinegar of Modena
MAIETTI, Annalisa
Primo
;TEDESCHI, Paola;BONETTI, Gianpiero;BRANDOLINI, VincenzoPenultimo
;
2015
Abstract
The aim of this work is to study the chemical and functional characterization of balsamic vinegar of Modena (BVM) and traditional balsamic vinegars from Modena (TBVM), using different methods to assay the phenolic content and the antioxidant activity. Besides, NMR analysis was used to obtain information about the principal substances in the samples. One hundred and nine samples of both TBVM and BVM were analyzed in all. Despite the observed high intragroup variability, the statistical analysis showed statistically significant differences between TBVM and BVM. The TBVMs are richer in phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins and show higher antioxidant capacity than BVMs. The general discriminant analysis (GDA) model including all the compositional and NMR data was able to group the samples according to the type of vinegar. The first canonical discriminant function explains 92.2 % of the total variance, and the leave-one out cross-validation show a predictive capacity of 89.6 %.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
10.1007_s12161-014-9902-y[1].pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
666.13 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
666.13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
11392-2279020_postprint_Maietti_Annalisa.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Post print
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
582.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
582.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.