Handwriting and typing involve distinct motor processes that influence how orthographic information is managed during word production. This study investigated how orthographic complexity—specifically digraphs—affects writing execution in Italian, a shallow orthography, in both adults (N = 36, Mage = 23.58) and adolescents (N = 36, Mage = 14.75). Participants completed a dictation task involving 32 stimuli (words and pseudowords) containing a digraph, writing them in both handwriting and typing modalities. During writing, interletter intervals (ILIs) were measured at three critical points: before the digraph (Syllable-Boundary-ILI), within the digraph (Digraph-ILI), and after the digraph (Post-Digraph-ILI). Results showed that across modalities and age groups, the Syllable-Boundary-ILI was longer than the other ILIs, indicating pre-planning of the following orthographic sequence. In handwriting, ILIs progressively shortened across the three positions, whereas in typing, ILIs remained constant within and after the digraph. Adolescents exhibited greater difficulty in initiating the digraphs and the subsequent vowels, particularly in typing, the modality they were less experienced with. These findings suggest that handwriting supports more cohesive motor planning of orthographic units, while typing relies on a more discrete approach, especially in younger, less skilled writers.

The impact of orthographic complexity on handwriting and typing in a shallow orthography

Cerni T.
Primo
2026

Abstract

Handwriting and typing involve distinct motor processes that influence how orthographic information is managed during word production. This study investigated how orthographic complexity—specifically digraphs—affects writing execution in Italian, a shallow orthography, in both adults (N = 36, Mage = 23.58) and adolescents (N = 36, Mage = 14.75). Participants completed a dictation task involving 32 stimuli (words and pseudowords) containing a digraph, writing them in both handwriting and typing modalities. During writing, interletter intervals (ILIs) were measured at three critical points: before the digraph (Syllable-Boundary-ILI), within the digraph (Digraph-ILI), and after the digraph (Post-Digraph-ILI). Results showed that across modalities and age groups, the Syllable-Boundary-ILI was longer than the other ILIs, indicating pre-planning of the following orthographic sequence. In handwriting, ILIs progressively shortened across the three positions, whereas in typing, ILIs remained constant within and after the digraph. Adolescents exhibited greater difficulty in initiating the digraphs and the subsequent vowels, particularly in typing, the modality they were less experienced with. These findings suggest that handwriting supports more cohesive motor planning of orthographic units, while typing relies on a more discrete approach, especially in younger, less skilled writers.
2026
Cerni, T.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025_Reading&Writing.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text ahead of print
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.01 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
s11145-025-10693-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 950.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
950.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2601610
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact