Background: Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, with inflammation playing a key role in disease progression and clinical complications of LC. The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), a readily available marker of systemic inflammation, has been linked to short-term adverse outcomes in LC, but data on long-term follow-up are limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between NLR and long-term all-cause mortality in an unselected cohort of LC patients. Methods: Data were gathered from the Italian multicenter observational study "PRO-LIVER". Patients with available data to calculate NLR at baseline were included. Baseline clinical determinants of NLR and the association of NRL with all-cause mortality at 2-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: From the overall cohort (n = 753), 506 patients with LC (31% female, mean age 64.8 ± 11.9 years) were included in the analysis. Median value of NLR was 2.42 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 1.61-3.52). At baseline, patients with NLR ≥ 2.42 were more likely to have Child-Pugh B or C, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or portal vein thrombosis (PVT). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 129 patients died: 44 (17%) with NLR < 2.42 and 85 (34%) with NLR ≥ 2.42 (p < 0.001). At multiple-adjusted Cox regression analysis, NLR ≥ 2.42 was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.12-2.44; p = 0.012), along with age, Child-Pugh C class, HCC and PVT. Conclusions: NLR is associated with long-term all-cause mortality in LC. NLR may serve as a potentially easily available tool to aid risk refinement in LC.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with worse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis: insights from the PRO-LIVER Registry

Roberto Manfredini
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2025

Abstract

Background: Liver cirrhosis (LC) is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, with inflammation playing a key role in disease progression and clinical complications of LC. The Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), a readily available marker of systemic inflammation, has been linked to short-term adverse outcomes in LC, but data on long-term follow-up are limited. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between NLR and long-term all-cause mortality in an unselected cohort of LC patients. Methods: Data were gathered from the Italian multicenter observational study "PRO-LIVER". Patients with available data to calculate NLR at baseline were included. Baseline clinical determinants of NLR and the association of NRL with all-cause mortality at 2-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: From the overall cohort (n = 753), 506 patients with LC (31% female, mean age 64.8 ± 11.9 years) were included in the analysis. Median value of NLR was 2.42 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 1.61-3.52). At baseline, patients with NLR ≥ 2.42 were more likely to have Child-Pugh B or C, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or portal vein thrombosis (PVT). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 129 patients died: 44 (17%) with NLR < 2.42 and 85 (34%) with NLR ≥ 2.42 (p < 0.001). At multiple-adjusted Cox regression analysis, NLR ≥ 2.42 was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.12-2.44; p = 0.012), along with age, Child-Pugh C class, HCC and PVT. Conclusions: NLR is associated with long-term all-cause mortality in LC. NLR may serve as a potentially easily available tool to aid risk refinement in LC.
2025
D'Amico, Tania; Miglionico, Marzia; Cangemi, Roberto; Francesco Romiti, Giulio; De Fabrizio, Benedetta; Fasano, Salvatore; Recchia, Fabrizio; Stefanin...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s11739-025-03955-x.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 679.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
679.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2595870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact