Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against Interleukin-4 receptor α is approved as add-on maintenance treatment for inadequately controlled type 2 severe asthma. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness, safety and economic impact of dupilumab compared to standard of care for uncontrolled severe asthma. Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs and health economic evaluations. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. Three RCTs including 2735 subjects > 12 years old and 24 to 52 weeks of follow-up were included. Dupilumab reduced with high certainty severe asthma exacerbations (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.45 to 0.59) and oral corticosteroid use (mean difference (MD) -28.2 mg/day; 95% CI -40.7 to -15.7). Asthma control (ACQ-5), quality of life (AQLQ) and rescue medication use [puffs/day] improved, without reaching the minimal important clinical difference: ACQ-5 MD -0.28 (95%CI -0.39 to -0.17); AQLQ MD +0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.37); rescue medication MD -0.35 (95%CI -0.73 to +0.02). FEV1 increases (MD +0.15; 95% CI +0.11 to +0.18) (moderate certainty). There is increased rate of dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) (moderate certainty) and of drug-related serious AEs (low certainty). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus standard therapy was 464,000 $/QALY (moderate certainty). More data on long term safety are needed both for children and adults, together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.

Efficacy and Safety of treatment with dupilumab for severe asthma: a systematic review of the EAACI guidelines-Recommendations on the use of biologicals in severe asthma

Papi, Alberto;
2020

Abstract

Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against Interleukin-4 receptor α is approved as add-on maintenance treatment for inadequately controlled type 2 severe asthma. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness, safety and economic impact of dupilumab compared to standard of care for uncontrolled severe asthma. Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs and health economic evaluations. Critical and important asthma-related outcomes were evaluated. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using GRADE. Three RCTs including 2735 subjects > 12 years old and 24 to 52 weeks of follow-up were included. Dupilumab reduced with high certainty severe asthma exacerbations (RR 0.51; 95%CI 0.45 to 0.59) and oral corticosteroid use (mean difference (MD) -28.2 mg/day; 95% CI -40.7 to -15.7). Asthma control (ACQ-5), quality of life (AQLQ) and rescue medication use [puffs/day] improved, without reaching the minimal important clinical difference: ACQ-5 MD -0.28 (95%CI -0.39 to -0.17); AQLQ MD +0.28 (95% CI 0.20 - 0.37); rescue medication MD -0.35 (95%CI -0.73 to +0.02). FEV1 increases (MD +0.15; 95% CI +0.11 to +0.18) (moderate certainty). There is increased rate of dupilumab-related adverse events (AEs) (moderate certainty) and of drug-related serious AEs (low certainty). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio versus standard therapy was 464,000 $/QALY (moderate certainty). More data on long term safety are needed both for children and adults, together with more efficacy data in the paediatric population.
2020
Agache, Ioana; Song, Yang; Rocha, Claudio; Beltran, Jessica; Posso, Margarita; Steiner, Corinna; Alonso-Coello, Pablo; Akdis, Cezmi; Akdis, Mubeccel; ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
all.14268.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 823.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
823.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2419198
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 30
  • Scopus 63
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 64
social impact