The intercell variability of the initial state and the impact of dc and pulse forming on intercell variability as well as on intracell variability in TiN/HfO2/Ti/TiN 1 transistor – 1 resistor (1T-1R) devices in 4-kb memory arrays were investigated. Nearly 78% of devices on particular arrays were dc formed with a wordline (WL) voltage $V_{text {WL}}= 1.4$ V and a bitline (BL) voltage $V_{text {BL}}= 2.3$ V, whereas 22% of devices were not formed due to the combined effect of the extrinsic process-induced intercell variability of the initial state and the intrinsic intercell variability after dc forming. Furthermore, pulse-induced forming with pulsewidths on the order of $10~mu text{s}$ ( $V_{text {WL}}= 1.4$ V and $V_{text {BL}}= 3.5$ V) caused for 86% of devices a low-resistance state. Using a retry algorithm, we achieve 100% of formed devices. To assess and confirm the nature of the variability during forming operation and during cycling, the quantum point-contact model was considered. The modeling results demonstrate a relationship between the forming and the device performance. The cells requiring high energy for the forming operation, due to impurities in the HfO2 deposition during array processing, are those subject to poor switching performance, larger variability, and faster wear out. Devices formed by a pulse-retry algorithm show: 1) shorter endurance and 2) higher variability during cycling.

Impact of Intercell and Intracell Variability on Forming and Switching Parameters in RRAM Arrays

GROSSI, Alessandro
Primo
;
ZAMBELLI, Cristian;OLIVO, Piero;
2015

Abstract

The intercell variability of the initial state and the impact of dc and pulse forming on intercell variability as well as on intracell variability in TiN/HfO2/Ti/TiN 1 transistor – 1 resistor (1T-1R) devices in 4-kb memory arrays were investigated. Nearly 78% of devices on particular arrays were dc formed with a wordline (WL) voltage $V_{text {WL}}= 1.4$ V and a bitline (BL) voltage $V_{text {BL}}= 2.3$ V, whereas 22% of devices were not formed due to the combined effect of the extrinsic process-induced intercell variability of the initial state and the intrinsic intercell variability after dc forming. Furthermore, pulse-induced forming with pulsewidths on the order of $10~mu text{s}$ ( $V_{text {WL}}= 1.4$ V and $V_{text {BL}}= 3.5$ V) caused for 86% of devices a low-resistance state. Using a retry algorithm, we achieve 100% of formed devices. To assess and confirm the nature of the variability during forming operation and during cycling, the quantum point-contact model was considered. The modeling results demonstrate a relationship between the forming and the device performance. The cells requiring high energy for the forming operation, due to impurities in the HfO2 deposition during array processing, are those subject to poor switching performance, larger variability, and faster wear out. Devices formed by a pulse-retry algorithm show: 1) shorter endurance and 2) higher variability during cycling.
2015
Grossi, Alessandro; Walczyk, Damian; Zambelli, Cristian; Miranda, Enrique; Olivo, Piero; Stikanov, Valeriy; Feriani, Alessandro; Sune, Jordi; Schoof, ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Impact of inter-cell and intra-cell variability on forming and switching parameters in RRAM arrays_Grossi_final_POSTPRINT.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Post print
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 536.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
536.27 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
11392_2328915_FULL_Zambelli.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 5.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.01 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2328915
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact