The purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic value of "buccal corridors" on smile attractiveness as judged by dentists and laypersons. In order to evaluate the aesthetic impact of the "buccal corridors", a pleasant smile (frontal view) was scanned (Scanner HP 5490C, 1200 x 1200 dpi) and modified (Adobe Photoshop 5.0) by a professional computer technician. Three pictures have been produced, one with minimal corridors (no 1), another with evident corridors (no 2), and a third one with moderate corridors (no 3). During a survey 1275 laypersons (413 M, 862 F; 14 to 77 years) and 646 dentists (361 M, 285 F; from 25 to 80 years) were asked to indicate the most pleasant and the most unpleasant smile and to fill in a short questionnaire; the data have been statistically evaluated through an ANOVA test. Among the laypersons: 838 (65.72%) chose the first smile; 91 (7.13%) the second one; whereas 346 (27.13%) the third one. The differences are statistically significant (p .05); no statist...

The smile buccal corridors: aesthetic value for dentists and laypersons.

SICILIANI, Giuseppe
2006

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic value of "buccal corridors" on smile attractiveness as judged by dentists and laypersons. In order to evaluate the aesthetic impact of the "buccal corridors", a pleasant smile (frontal view) was scanned (Scanner HP 5490C, 1200 x 1200 dpi) and modified (Adobe Photoshop 5.0) by a professional computer technician. Three pictures have been produced, one with minimal corridors (no 1), another with evident corridors (no 2), and a third one with moderate corridors (no 3). During a survey 1275 laypersons (413 M, 862 F; 14 to 77 years) and 646 dentists (361 M, 285 F; from 25 to 80 years) were asked to indicate the most pleasant and the most unpleasant smile and to fill in a short questionnaire; the data have been statistically evaluated through an ANOVA test. Among the laypersons: 838 (65.72%) chose the first smile; 91 (7.13%) the second one; whereas 346 (27.13%) the third one. The differences are statistically significant (p .05); no statist...
2006
Gracco, A; Cozzani, M; D'Elia, L; Manfrini, M; Peverada, C; Siciliani, Giuseppe
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/471468
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact