The increasing use of algorithmic decision-making in important areas such as education, welfare and justice requires us to reconsider what fairness means. Reducing fairness to the formal impartiality of code can perpetuate structural inequalities that are divorced from real-world conditions. Building on the ideas of John Rawls and Amartya Sen, this paper puts forward a model of capability-sensitive algorithmic governance that integrates legal duties, adaptive technical architectures and distributed accountability. Rather than merely complying with neutral rules, algorithms should compensate for disparities in converting resources into real opportunities. Fairness must therefore emerge by design as an institutional, contestable and context-aware property. In this way, the algorithm becomes an ethical institution, embedding justifying constraints and assuming public responsibility within a decision-making infrastructure shaped by procedural and distributive justice, thereby redefining the normative status of algorithms as agents of institutional fairness.

Dall’equità formale all’equità algoritmica : Per una capability-sensitive AI governance

Enrico MAESTRI
Primo
2025

Abstract

The increasing use of algorithmic decision-making in important areas such as education, welfare and justice requires us to reconsider what fairness means. Reducing fairness to the formal impartiality of code can perpetuate structural inequalities that are divorced from real-world conditions. Building on the ideas of John Rawls and Amartya Sen, this paper puts forward a model of capability-sensitive algorithmic governance that integrates legal duties, adaptive technical architectures and distributed accountability. Rather than merely complying with neutral rules, algorithms should compensate for disparities in converting resources into real opportunities. Fairness must therefore emerge by design as an institutional, contestable and context-aware property. In this way, the algorithm becomes an ethical institution, embedding justifying constraints and assuming public responsibility within a decision-making infrastructure shaped by procedural and distributive justice, thereby redefining the normative status of algorithms as agents of institutional fairness.
2025
Maestri, Enrico
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Maestri_Politeia_161 bz1_61-88 - DEFINITIVO.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: testo
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 841.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
841.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Politeia-La-Rivista-03-31-2026_12_44_PM.png

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: copertina e indice del fascicolo
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 459.86 kB
Formato PNG
459.86 kB PNG   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2638134
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact