Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
SFERA Archivio dei prodotti della Ricerca dell'Università di Ferrara
Background:
Defecatory disorders and pelvic floor dysfunctions are prevalent and significantly impact quality of
life. Due to their multifactorial etiology, a multidisciplinary approach and pelvic floor rehabilitation
(PFR) are recommended, however their implementation varies widely. This study aimed to evaluate
current practices in multidisciplinary management and rehabilitation strategies for defecatory disorders
in Italy.
Methods:
A 25-item, web-based survey was distributed to members of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery
between May and July 2024. The questionnaire explored the professional background of the
responders, the availability and composition of the multidisciplinary team (MDT), the use of PFR
and related clinical practices.
Results:
A total of 183 colorectal surgeons from 20 Italian regions completed the survey. Only 49% reported
the presence of a structured MDT, with frequent absence of a urologist, gastroenterologist, and radiologist.
Combined pelvic floor surgery was rarely performed, despite its clinical advantages. PFR
services were available in just over half of the centers, often without psychological or nutritional
support. Rehabilitative techniques varied, with volumetric rehabilitation and tibial nerve stimulation
being underutilized. Referral rates to rehabilitation remained low, regardless of institution type or
surgical experience. Despite the lack of standardized protocols, a quarter of responders utilized
perioperative rehabilitation in the context of rectal prolapse surgery.
Conclusions:
Significant variability exists in the multidisciplinary and rehabilitative management of defecatory
disorders in Italy. To optimize care, greater integration of MDT, wider access to a standardized PFR
and the adoption of combined surgical approaches are needed.
Multidisciplinary approach and rehabilitation practice for defecatory disorders in Italy: a snapshot survey on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
Background:
Defecatory disorders and pelvic floor dysfunctions are prevalent and significantly impact quality of
life. Due to their multifactorial etiology, a multidisciplinary approach and pelvic floor rehabilitation
(PFR) are recommended, however their implementation varies widely. This study aimed to evaluate
current practices in multidisciplinary management and rehabilitation strategies for defecatory disorders
in Italy.
Methods:
A 25-item, web-based survey was distributed to members of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery
between May and July 2024. The questionnaire explored the professional background of the
responders, the availability and composition of the multidisciplinary team (MDT), the use of PFR
and related clinical practices.
Results:
A total of 183 colorectal surgeons from 20 Italian regions completed the survey. Only 49% reported
the presence of a structured MDT, with frequent absence of a urologist, gastroenterologist, and radiologist.
Combined pelvic floor surgery was rarely performed, despite its clinical advantages. PFR
services were available in just over half of the centers, often without psychological or nutritional
support. Rehabilitative techniques varied, with volumetric rehabilitation and tibial nerve stimulation
being underutilized. Referral rates to rehabilitation remained low, regardless of institution type or
surgical experience. Despite the lack of standardized protocols, a quarter of responders utilized
perioperative rehabilitation in the context of rectal prolapse surgery.
Conclusions:
Significant variability exists in the multidisciplinary and rehabilitative management of defecatory
disorders in Italy. To optimize care, greater integration of MDT, wider access to a standardized PFR
and the adoption of combined surgical approaches are needed.
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2635771
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.