BACKGROUND: The integration of innovative technologies in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) has significantly advanced patient care, enhancing functional recovery and optimizing rehabilitation processes. Despite growing clinical adoption, a translational gap persists between technological advancements and routine clinical implementation. This study aims to map the available evidence on rehabilitation technologies, identifying their applications, effectiveness, and existing limitations. METHODS: A mapping review of systematic reviews was conducted to explore the role of technological innovations in PRM. A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database was performed up to July 14th, 2024. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on rehabilitation domains, technological interventions, target populations, and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) aspects. RESULTS: Of 5124 identified records, 623 systematic reviews (12.2%) met the inclusion criteria. Neurological conditions represented the primary focus (56.8%), followed by musculoskeletal (23.7%) and cardiovascular rehabilitation (11.5%). The most frequently studied technologies included virtual reality (28.5%), non-invasive brain stimulation (18.7%), robotics (16.3%), and telerehabilitation (13.4%). Most studies assessed motor recovery (45%), pain management (22%), and cognitive or language rehabilitation (18%). Only 4.8% addressed HTA aspects such as cost-effectiveness and acceptability, highlighting a gap in real-world implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: This mapping review underscores the increasing interest in technology-assisted rehabilitation but also highlights critical gaps, particularly in HTA assessments and training for PRM specialists. Standardized guidelines, structured training programs, and economic evaluations are essential to optimize integrating rehabilitation technologies into clinical practice. Further research should focus on long-term efficacy, accessibility, and sustainability to ensure equitable access to innovative rehabilitation solutions.
The adoption of innovative technologies in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: state of the art and unmet needs
Straudi S.;Antonioni A.;
2026
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The integration of innovative technologies in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) has significantly advanced patient care, enhancing functional recovery and optimizing rehabilitation processes. Despite growing clinical adoption, a translational gap persists between technological advancements and routine clinical implementation. This study aims to map the available evidence on rehabilitation technologies, identifying their applications, effectiveness, and existing limitations. METHODS: A mapping review of systematic reviews was conducted to explore the role of technological innovations in PRM. A systematic search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database was performed up to July 14th, 2024. Eligible studies were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on rehabilitation domains, technological interventions, target populations, and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) aspects. RESULTS: Of 5124 identified records, 623 systematic reviews (12.2%) met the inclusion criteria. Neurological conditions represented the primary focus (56.8%), followed by musculoskeletal (23.7%) and cardiovascular rehabilitation (11.5%). The most frequently studied technologies included virtual reality (28.5%), non-invasive brain stimulation (18.7%), robotics (16.3%), and telerehabilitation (13.4%). Most studies assessed motor recovery (45%), pain management (22%), and cognitive or language rehabilitation (18%). Only 4.8% addressed HTA aspects such as cost-effectiveness and acceptability, highlighting a gap in real-world implementation studies. CONCLUSIONS: This mapping review underscores the increasing interest in technology-assisted rehabilitation but also highlights critical gaps, particularly in HTA assessments and training for PRM specialists. Standardized guidelines, structured training programs, and economic evaluations are essential to optimize integrating rehabilitation technologies into clinical practice. Further research should focus on long-term efficacy, accessibility, and sustainability to ensure equitable access to innovative rehabilitation solutions.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
