This study develops a human-centered Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework enabling rapid ecodesign prioritization for Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) compliance while demonstrating Large Language Model (LLM) integration in sustainability strategy. A four-stage hybrid methodology combining LLM-assisted action identification (30 ESPR-aligned interventions) with multi-criteria decision analysis with analytic hierarchy process (MCDA-AHP) is developed. Expert validation addressed LLM-driven interventions' limitations with practitioners evaluating AI suggestions based on the value chain context. The framework applied to two Italian building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) small-medium enterprises (SMEs) demonstrated strategic differentiation based on feasibility vs. desirability vs. affordability, producing systematically different action portfolios within regulation-aligned aggregate structures. Sensitivity analysis showed 100% priority stability under ±10% AHP variations for priority one, three, and four actions and 82% for priority two actions, validating framework robustness. The framework provides empirical evidence for augmentation-not-automation in AI-assisted strategic planning, contributing a replicable methodology for responsible LLM integration across manufacturing sectors. Results demonstrate that combining AI synthesis efficiency with human contextual judgment enable regulation-aligned, business-model-specific sustainability strategies

Ecodesign Prioritization for BIPV Manufacturers Under ESPR Compliance: An LLM-Assisted Multi-Criteria Framework with Use Cases Application

Pracucci, Alessandro
Primo
Methodology
;
2026

Abstract

This study develops a human-centered Artificial Intelligence (AI) framework enabling rapid ecodesign prioritization for Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) compliance while demonstrating Large Language Model (LLM) integration in sustainability strategy. A four-stage hybrid methodology combining LLM-assisted action identification (30 ESPR-aligned interventions) with multi-criteria decision analysis with analytic hierarchy process (MCDA-AHP) is developed. Expert validation addressed LLM-driven interventions' limitations with practitioners evaluating AI suggestions based on the value chain context. The framework applied to two Italian building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) small-medium enterprises (SMEs) demonstrated strategic differentiation based on feasibility vs. desirability vs. affordability, producing systematically different action portfolios within regulation-aligned aggregate structures. Sensitivity analysis showed 100% priority stability under ±10% AHP variations for priority one, three, and four actions and 82% for priority two actions, validating framework robustness. The framework provides empirical evidence for augmentation-not-automation in AI-assisted strategic planning, contributing a replicable methodology for responsible LLM integration across manufacturing sectors. Results demonstrate that combining AI synthesis efficiency with human contextual judgment enable regulation-aligned, business-model-specific sustainability strategies
2026
Pracucci, Alessandro; Giovanardi, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2627210
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact