Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
SFERA Archivio dei prodotti della Ricerca dell'Università di Ferrara
Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has transformed prostate cancer (PCa) management by improving lesion detection and guiding treatment decisions across disease stages. Following the first paper of the Italian PSMA Survey focused on technical aspects and primary staging, this second analysis explores its clinical use in PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence (BCR), hormone-sensitive metastatic (mHSPC), and castration-resistant metastatic (mCRPC) settings. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted jointly by five Italian scientific societies involving nuclear medicine physicians, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and urologists (AIMN, AIOM, AIRO, SIU, SIUrO) and the Meet-URO cooperative group. Dedicated sections addressed the adoption, timing, and perceived clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy, BCR, mHSPC, and mCRPC. Responses were analysed descriptively and stratified by medical competences (clinicians versus nuclear medicine physicians). Results: PSMA PET/CT emerged as the preferred imaging modality in all clinical scenarios. In PSA persistence and BCR, 87–95% of respondents selected PSMA PET as first-line imaging, most often performed at PSA levels of 0.2–0.5 ng/mL. When negative, more than two-thirds recommended repeating PSMA PET/CT after PSA further rise. In mHSPC, over 80% of clinicians applied the CHAARTED criteria directly to PSMA PET findings, while PSMA PET/CT was also widely used for restaging and therapy monitoring. In mCRPC, PSMA PET/CT was routinely used for baseline and follow-up imaging. Most clinicians considered the low-dose CT component sufficient for radioligand therapy (RLT) eligibility, while [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was reserved for selected high-risk or discordant cases. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT has become the central imaging modality in the management of advanced PCa in Italy. Its adoption has progressed faster than supporting evidence, underscoring the need for prospective validation, implementation of harmonised interpretation criteria, and unified national recommendations.
Joint survey by AIMN, AIOM, AIRO, SIU, SIUrO, and Meet-URO about the use of PSMA PET imaging in prostate cancer in Italy: PSA persistence, biochemical recurrence, hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant metastatic settings
Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has transformed prostate cancer (PCa) management by improving lesion detection and guiding treatment decisions across disease stages. Following the first paper of the Italian PSMA Survey focused on technical aspects and primary staging, this second analysis explores its clinical use in PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence (BCR), hormone-sensitive metastatic (mHSPC), and castration-resistant metastatic (mCRPC) settings. Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted jointly by five Italian scientific societies involving nuclear medicine physicians, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and urologists (AIMN, AIOM, AIRO, SIU, SIUrO) and the Meet-URO cooperative group. Dedicated sections addressed the adoption, timing, and perceived clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy, BCR, mHSPC, and mCRPC. Responses were analysed descriptively and stratified by medical competences (clinicians versus nuclear medicine physicians). Results: PSMA PET/CT emerged as the preferred imaging modality in all clinical scenarios. In PSA persistence and BCR, 87–95% of respondents selected PSMA PET as first-line imaging, most often performed at PSA levels of 0.2–0.5 ng/mL. When negative, more than two-thirds recommended repeating PSMA PET/CT after PSA further rise. In mHSPC, over 80% of clinicians applied the CHAARTED criteria directly to PSMA PET findings, while PSMA PET/CT was also widely used for restaging and therapy monitoring. In mCRPC, PSMA PET/CT was routinely used for baseline and follow-up imaging. Most clinicians considered the low-dose CT component sufficient for radioligand therapy (RLT) eligibility, while [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was reserved for selected high-risk or discordant cases. Conclusion: PSMA PET/CT has become the central imaging modality in the management of advanced PCa in Italy. Its adoption has progressed faster than supporting evidence, underscoring the need for prospective validation, implementation of harmonised interpretation criteria, and unified national recommendations.
Bauckneht, Matteo; Evangelista, Laura; Sofia, Luca; Maccauro, Marco; Filice, Angelina; De Rimini, Maria Luisa; Caffo, Orazio; Messina, Carlo; Maruzzo,...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2626710
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
0
0
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.