Aortic arch diseases represent one of the most complex domains in cardiovascular surgery due to the need for cerebral protection, anatomical precision, and durable reconstruction. Their management requires highly individualized strategies that balance cerebral protection, systemic organ perfusion, anatomical complexity, and long-term durability. Over recent decades, antegrade cerebral perfusion has significantly reduced neurological morbidity. In parallel, vascular prostheses have progressed from conventional Dacron grafts to hybrid stent graft systems simplifying arch reconstruction and expanded treatment options in high-risk cohorts. Total endovascular arch repair using branched or fenestrated devices has emerged for selected high-risk patients; however, current data remain limited, with early stroke rates of approximately 5–8% and restricted long-term durability evidence. From both clinical and economic perspectives, open and hybrid approaches remain central to durable arch management.

Hybrid and Total Endovascular Solutions for Aortic Arch Disease: Contemporary Surgical Strategies

Paolo Zamboni
Penultimo
;
Jacob Zeitani
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

Aortic arch diseases represent one of the most complex domains in cardiovascular surgery due to the need for cerebral protection, anatomical precision, and durable reconstruction. Their management requires highly individualized strategies that balance cerebral protection, systemic organ perfusion, anatomical complexity, and long-term durability. Over recent decades, antegrade cerebral perfusion has significantly reduced neurological morbidity. In parallel, vascular prostheses have progressed from conventional Dacron grafts to hybrid stent graft systems simplifying arch reconstruction and expanded treatment options in high-risk cohorts. Total endovascular arch repair using branched or fenestrated devices has emerged for selected high-risk patients; however, current data remain limited, with early stroke rates of approximately 5–8% and restricted long-term durability evidence. From both clinical and economic perspectives, open and hybrid approaches remain central to durable arch management.
2026
Likaj, Ermal; Kuci, Saimir; Ibrahimi, Alfred; Goga, Marsela; Cela, Alvi; Zamboni, Paolo; Zeitani, Jacob
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-15 mdpi 2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 809.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
809.39 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2621013
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact