The abstract compares two 3D culture methods (hanging drop vs clinostat bioreactor) for generating HT‑144 melanoma spheroids and evaluates how these systems respond to the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib. It quantitatively assesses spheroid morphology, proliferation markers (Cyclin D1, Ki‑67), and oxidative status (DCF, 4‑HNE, mitochondrial O2−), showing that drug responses and redox readouts depend on the 3D culture technique, with the dynamic bioreactor approach yielding more reproducible, consistent data.
Comparative assessment of oxidative status of 3D melanoma spheroids obtained with different techniques
Benedusi, Mascia
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Trinchera, GiuliaMembro del Collaboration Group
;Casoni, AliceMembro del Collaboration Group
;Burns, Jorge S.Writing – Review & Editing
;Valacchi, GiuseppeSupervision
2024
Abstract
The abstract compares two 3D culture methods (hanging drop vs clinostat bioreactor) for generating HT‑144 melanoma spheroids and evaluates how these systems respond to the BRAFV600E inhibitor vemurafenib. It quantitatively assesses spheroid morphology, proliferation markers (Cyclin D1, Ki‑67), and oxidative status (DCF, 4‑HNE, mitochondrial O2−), showing that drug responses and redox readouts depend on the 3D culture technique, with the dynamic bioreactor approach yielding more reproducible, consistent data.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
