Supplier selection and order allocation, a longstanding challenge in supply chain management, has recently begun incorporating risk minimization alongside cost, reflecting growing interest in supply chain resilience and risk mitigation. In response, hybrid frameworks leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning have emerged. However, current methods often lack mechanisms to update decisions over time and typically rely solely on demand forecasts. To address these gaps, this study introduces a new hybrid approach that integrates machine learning–based predictions of supplier delivery delays into a linear programming model for multiperiod supplier selection and order allocation. Additionally, the proposed method evaluates a continuous training strategy, wherein predictions and decisions are refreshed as new data become available. Empirical evidence from an automotive case study demonstrates that this approach reduces prediction errors and total costs more effectively than models without continuous training, albeit with increased order allocation instability.

A continuous training approach for risk informed supplier selection and order allocation

Gabellini M.
Primo
;
2025

Abstract

Supplier selection and order allocation, a longstanding challenge in supply chain management, has recently begun incorporating risk minimization alongside cost, reflecting growing interest in supply chain resilience and risk mitigation. In response, hybrid frameworks leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning have emerged. However, current methods often lack mechanisms to update decisions over time and typically rely solely on demand forecasts. To address these gaps, this study introduces a new hybrid approach that integrates machine learning–based predictions of supplier delivery delays into a linear programming model for multiperiod supplier selection and order allocation. Additionally, the proposed method evaluates a continuous training strategy, wherein predictions and decisions are refreshed as new data become available. Empirical evidence from an automotive case study demonstrates that this approach reduces prediction errors and total costs more effectively than models without continuous training, albeit with increased order allocation instability.
2025
Gabellini, M.; Mak, S.; Schoepf, S.; Brintrup, A.; Regattieri, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
definitivo pub.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.42 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2617492
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact