Aims The effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) has been debated during the past decade. The objectives of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Meta-Analysis of Trials in people with CHD using individual participant data (IPD) (CaReMATCH) study were to (i) provide contemporary estimates on the effectiveness of ExCR for CHD and (ii) examine potential differential effects of ExCR across subgroups.Methods and results Individual participant data from randomized controlled trials comparing ExCR with no ExCR controls were pooled. To reflect contemporary ExCR practice, trials had to be published since 2010. The outcomes of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality and hospitalization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were analysed. From 30 eligible trials (10 677 participants), IPD were obtained from eight trials (4975 participants, 93.5% post-myocardial infarction). Compared with controls, participation in ExCR resulted in a lower risk for all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53, 0.87] and CVD-related hospitalization (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83) and higher HRQoL up to 12 months of follow-up (mean difference in utility index: 0.032, 95% CI: 0.003, 0.061). No differences were found in all-cause and CVD mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.32; HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.32, 2.04, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed stronger improvements of HRQoL with ExCR in people with lower HRQoL and lower education level and larger reductions in hospitalization risk in those with a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower baseline exercise capacity, beta-blockers use, and with a previous history of CVD. No other subgroup effects were observed.Conclusion Our IPD meta-analysis, reflecting trials published since 2010, highlighted that contemporary ExCR is effective in reducing risk of hospitalization and improving HRQoL in those with CHD. Importantly, we reveal treatment benefits to be robust and consistent across most participant subgroups. Together, these data support the class I recommendation of international clinical guidelines that ExCR should be offered to all people with CHD.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42020204988Coronary heart disease is the most common cause of death globally. People with coronary heart disease are often referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR). These programmes include exercise training, sometimes combined with education or social support. Their aim is to improve health and quality of life.The CaReMATCH project combined results from recent studies that randomly allocated people with coronary heart disease to either participate in ExCR or not. We investigated how well ExCR works and whether its effects differ between groups of people.People who took part in ExCR were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (for any reason, or for heart-related problems) and reported better quality of life. ExCR did not help people to live longer.The benefits for quality of life were greater who started the intervention with poorer quality of life or lower education levels. People with poorer heart function, lower fitness levels, or a history of heart disease also saw greater reductions in hospital admissions for heart-related problems compared with those who did not take part in ExCR.

Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart disease - the CaReMATCH individual participant data meta-analysis

Campo, Gianluca;
2026

Abstract

Aims The effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) has been debated during the past decade. The objectives of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Meta-Analysis of Trials in people with CHD using individual participant data (IPD) (CaReMATCH) study were to (i) provide contemporary estimates on the effectiveness of ExCR for CHD and (ii) examine potential differential effects of ExCR across subgroups.Methods and results Individual participant data from randomized controlled trials comparing ExCR with no ExCR controls were pooled. To reflect contemporary ExCR practice, trials had to be published since 2010. The outcomes of all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality and hospitalization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were analysed. From 30 eligible trials (10 677 participants), IPD were obtained from eight trials (4975 participants, 93.5% post-myocardial infarction). Compared with controls, participation in ExCR resulted in a lower risk for all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53, 0.87] and CVD-related hospitalization (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.83) and higher HRQoL up to 12 months of follow-up (mean difference in utility index: 0.032, 95% CI: 0.003, 0.061). No differences were found in all-cause and CVD mortality (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.74, 1.32; HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.32, 2.04, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed stronger improvements of HRQoL with ExCR in people with lower HRQoL and lower education level and larger reductions in hospitalization risk in those with a lower left ventricular ejection fraction, lower baseline exercise capacity, beta-blockers use, and with a previous history of CVD. No other subgroup effects were observed.Conclusion Our IPD meta-analysis, reflecting trials published since 2010, highlighted that contemporary ExCR is effective in reducing risk of hospitalization and improving HRQoL in those with CHD. Importantly, we reveal treatment benefits to be robust and consistent across most participant subgroups. Together, these data support the class I recommendation of international clinical guidelines that ExCR should be offered to all people with CHD.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42020204988Coronary heart disease is the most common cause of death globally. People with coronary heart disease are often referred to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR). These programmes include exercise training, sometimes combined with education or social support. Their aim is to improve health and quality of life.The CaReMATCH project combined results from recent studies that randomly allocated people with coronary heart disease to either participate in ExCR or not. We investigated how well ExCR works and whether its effects differ between groups of people.People who took part in ExCR were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (for any reason, or for heart-related problems) and reported better quality of life. ExCR did not help people to live longer.The benefits for quality of life were greater who started the intervention with poorer quality of life or lower education levels. People with poorer heart function, lower fitness levels, or a history of heart disease also saw greater reductions in hospital admissions for heart-related problems compared with those who did not take part in ExCR.
2026
Stens, Niels A; Buckley, Benjamin Jr; Dibben, Grace O; Buffart, Laurien M; Kleinnibbelink, Geert; Prabhakaran, Dorairaj; Chandrasekaran, Ambalam M; Ki...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
zwaf629.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text ahead of print
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.37 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
zwaf629.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2608438
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact