Background/Objectives: We aimed to test whether home-based low-intensity interval training (LIIT) could be equally or more effective than traditional continuous walking advice (TWA) in a population hospitalized and healed from severe COVID-19. Methods: This pragmatic nonrandomized controlled trial (NCT04615390) enrolled patients admitted to intensive care units due to COVID-19 who at discharge from the hospital were given a choice between either a home-based LIIT program or TWA. The former received a structured LIIT walking (1:1 walk:rest ratio per 10 times) to be performed at a prescribed progressively increasing speed maintained with a metronome. The latter received TWA according to the guidelines (30 min or moderate intensity activity, 5 days/week). Outcome measures, collected at baseline, at the end of the 3-month training and at the 6-month follow-up, included 6 min walking distance (primary), lower limb strength, quality of life, depression and cognitive status. Results: From a total of 85 enrolled patients, 69 of them (LIIT n = 32; TWA n = 37) completed the study. Home exercise was safely executed with an 82% adherence for the LIIT group and 64% adherence for TWA. After the 3-month program, both groups significantly improved the 6MWD (LIIT: +87 m vs. TWA +42 m; p < 0.001) with a significant difference that was also maintained at follow-up (LIIT: +138 m vs. TWA +69 m; p < 0.001). No other significant between-group differences were noted. However, patients in the LIIT group significantly improved in the majority of the outcomes, while patients of TWA improved in only the primary outcome and the physical component of quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with TWA, LIIT walking was feasible, safe and associated with more favorable multidimensional recovery in COVID-19 survivors after hospitalization for severe pneumonitis.

A Structured Low-Intensity Home-Based Walking Program to Improve Physical and Mental Functioning After Hospitalization for Severe COVID-19: A Pragmatic Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Lamberti N.
Co-primo
;
Baroni A.
Co-primo
;
Piva G.;Fregna G.;Crepaldi A.;Gamberini L.;Straudi S.
Penultimo
;
Manfredini F.
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: We aimed to test whether home-based low-intensity interval training (LIIT) could be equally or more effective than traditional continuous walking advice (TWA) in a population hospitalized and healed from severe COVID-19. Methods: This pragmatic nonrandomized controlled trial (NCT04615390) enrolled patients admitted to intensive care units due to COVID-19 who at discharge from the hospital were given a choice between either a home-based LIIT program or TWA. The former received a structured LIIT walking (1:1 walk:rest ratio per 10 times) to be performed at a prescribed progressively increasing speed maintained with a metronome. The latter received TWA according to the guidelines (30 min or moderate intensity activity, 5 days/week). Outcome measures, collected at baseline, at the end of the 3-month training and at the 6-month follow-up, included 6 min walking distance (primary), lower limb strength, quality of life, depression and cognitive status. Results: From a total of 85 enrolled patients, 69 of them (LIIT n = 32; TWA n = 37) completed the study. Home exercise was safely executed with an 82% adherence for the LIIT group and 64% adherence for TWA. After the 3-month program, both groups significantly improved the 6MWD (LIIT: +87 m vs. TWA +42 m; p < 0.001) with a significant difference that was also maintained at follow-up (LIIT: +138 m vs. TWA +69 m; p < 0.001). No other significant between-group differences were noted. However, patients in the LIIT group significantly improved in the majority of the outcomes, while patients of TWA improved in only the primary outcome and the physical component of quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with TWA, LIIT walking was feasible, safe and associated with more favorable multidimensional recovery in COVID-19 survivors after hospitalization for severe pneumonitis.
2025
Lamberti, N.; Baroni, A.; Piva, G.; Fregna, G.; Schincaglia, N.; Crepaldi, A.; Gamberini, L.; Occhi, A.; Straudi, S.; Manfredini, F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2025_LambertiN_JCM_Covid_Rehabilitation.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 911.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
911.91 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2603953
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact