Microalgae are gaining increasing attention for wastewater (WW) depuration thanks to their ability to remove pollutants from WW. As environmental conditions change widely geographically and throughout the year, also reaching growth-limiting temperatures during the cold season, sites and seasons specific tests are needed to assess the actual implementation of microalgae phytoremediation. In this paper, two site-specific prototype-scale experiments were performed to test the ability of an autochthonous microalga to depurate urban WW efficiently during winter. Two setups were tested: one indoor and one outdoor. We evaluated dry biomass production, photosynthetic stress, and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removals from WW. In addition, Escherichia coli concentration was monitored on the effluent. Despite the limited growth in both conditions, N was largely removed from the medium, with the highest result recorded outdoors (almost 70%). No P removal was recorded, although P content in biomass increased both indoors and outdoors, meaning that multiple processes could occur at the same time. Moreover, a huge decrease in E. coli content was recorded in both conditions, suggesting potential for effluent disinfection.
Urban Wastewater Phytoremediation by Autochthonous Microalgae in Winter Season: Indoor and Outdoor Trials
Giaco' P.Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Baldisserotto C.Secondo
Supervision
;Demaria S.Investigation
;Pancaldi S.
Ultimo
Funding Acquisition
2025
Abstract
Microalgae are gaining increasing attention for wastewater (WW) depuration thanks to their ability to remove pollutants from WW. As environmental conditions change widely geographically and throughout the year, also reaching growth-limiting temperatures during the cold season, sites and seasons specific tests are needed to assess the actual implementation of microalgae phytoremediation. In this paper, two site-specific prototype-scale experiments were performed to test the ability of an autochthonous microalga to depurate urban WW efficiently during winter. Two setups were tested: one indoor and one outdoor. We evaluated dry biomass production, photosynthetic stress, and nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removals from WW. In addition, Escherichia coli concentration was monitored on the effluent. Despite the limited growth in both conditions, N was largely removed from the medium, with the highest result recorded outdoors (almost 70%). No P removal was recorded, although P content in biomass increased both indoors and outdoors, meaning that multiple processes could occur at the same time. Moreover, a huge decrease in E. coli content was recorded in both conditions, suggesting potential for effluent disinfection.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025 ApplSciences.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
12.22 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
12.22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
|
2025 ApplSciences_SUPPL.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Materiale supplementare
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
142.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
142.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


