The study is intended as a contribution to linguistic reflection on the desideratum of sustainability in relation to use of language and to discourses on language. Starting from the question of how the concept of linguistic sustainability is used in different languages and linguistic approaches, it discusses the results of early research in the field of ecolinguistics and the ecology of language, as well as the competing and partly overlapping concepts of (linguistic) diversity and vitality. It then explores the question of how sustainability, hegemonic aspirations and monolingual or multilingual language habitus relate to each other, especially in an age of increasing economization of knowledge and growing ranking pressure on educational and research institutions: Is the goal of linguistic sustainability and the preservation of linguistic-cultural diversity seriously pursued and perceived as achievable, or are the corresponding key terms (multilingualism, diversity) primarily part of a basically inconsequential “post-materialist” discourses? The considerations lead to a reflection on the possibilities and limits of linguistic sustainability with regard to the progressive economization of knowledge and science, which influence language use, and on the other hand with regard to the gap between real developments, which seem to privilege one or at best a few languages, and the official narratives on the promotion of multilingualism. This gap is interpreted in the context of the hypothesis of structural or systemic social unsustainability (Blühdorn 2020) and particularly in line with Blühdorn's concept of ‘Simulative Democracy’ (2013).

Sprache und Nachhaltigkeit, sprachliche Nachhaltigket: zwischen Ökonomisierung und simulativer Demokratie?

G. Rocco
Primo
2024

Abstract

The study is intended as a contribution to linguistic reflection on the desideratum of sustainability in relation to use of language and to discourses on language. Starting from the question of how the concept of linguistic sustainability is used in different languages and linguistic approaches, it discusses the results of early research in the field of ecolinguistics and the ecology of language, as well as the competing and partly overlapping concepts of (linguistic) diversity and vitality. It then explores the question of how sustainability, hegemonic aspirations and monolingual or multilingual language habitus relate to each other, especially in an age of increasing economization of knowledge and growing ranking pressure on educational and research institutions: Is the goal of linguistic sustainability and the preservation of linguistic-cultural diversity seriously pursued and perceived as achievable, or are the corresponding key terms (multilingualism, diversity) primarily part of a basically inconsequential “post-materialist” discourses? The considerations lead to a reflection on the possibilities and limits of linguistic sustainability with regard to the progressive economization of knowledge and science, which influence language use, and on the other hand with regard to the gap between real developments, which seem to privilege one or at best a few languages, and the official narratives on the promotion of multilingualism. This gap is interpreted in the context of the hypothesis of structural or systemic social unsustainability (Blühdorn 2020) and particularly in line with Blühdorn's concept of ‘Simulative Democracy’ (2013).
2024
Rocco, G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LINGUISTICA ROCCO Sprachliche Nachhaltigkeit.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2575510
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact