Orchestrating microservice applications deployed on a federation of globally distributed Kubernetes clusters is a challenging and multifaceted optimization problem. It is not only computationally hard, but also requires balancing a delicate trade-off between competing performance metrics, such as latency, deployment cost, and service interruption frequency. Classical approaches in the literature merge multiple objectives into a single one via, e.g., linear combinations. However, in practice, it is complex to express a priori a quantitative preference between heterogeneous objectives, let alone with simple linear combinations. This paper adopts a more comprehensive approach leveraging proper Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO), with the goal of producing multiple solutions from the Pareto Front (PF). Therefore, the orchestrator can inspect a posteriori all possible “optimal” trade-offs and decide on the strategy that best fits their operating requirements. To solve the MOO problem, this paper adopts state-of-the-art Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms and shows their effectiveness in solving the MOO problem. Illustrative results highlight the practical benefits of a MOO formulation, providing several tens of nondominated solutions and evenly covering the objectives’ space.

Multi-objective scheduling and resource allocation of Kubernetes replicas across the compute continuum

Filippo Poltronieri;Mattia Zaccarini;Mauro Tortonesi;Cesare Stefanelli;
2024

Abstract

Orchestrating microservice applications deployed on a federation of globally distributed Kubernetes clusters is a challenging and multifaceted optimization problem. It is not only computationally hard, but also requires balancing a delicate trade-off between competing performance metrics, such as latency, deployment cost, and service interruption frequency. Classical approaches in the literature merge multiple objectives into a single one via, e.g., linear combinations. However, in practice, it is complex to express a priori a quantitative preference between heterogeneous objectives, let alone with simple linear combinations. This paper adopts a more comprehensive approach leveraging proper Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO), with the goal of producing multiple solutions from the Pareto Front (PF). Therefore, the orchestrator can inspect a posteriori all possible “optimal” trade-offs and decide on the strategy that best fits their operating requirements. To solve the MOO problem, this paper adopts state-of-the-art Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms and shows their effectiveness in solving the MOO problem. Illustrative results highlight the practical benefits of a MOO formulation, providing several tens of nondominated solutions and evenly covering the objectives’ space.
2024
Kubernetes, Resource Allocation, Multi-Objective Optimization, ILP, Evolutionary Algorithms, Compute Continuum
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2574899
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact