Background: The use of telemedicine has spread to all areas of medicine, including obstetrics, over the last few decades. Objective: To identify and map the diversity and applicability of telemedicine in the obstetric literature, in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. To assess patient satisfaction and possible areas for future development. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and its extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched the databases PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), EMBASE Ovid and Scopus. We also searched Google Scholar, clinicaltrial.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP-WHO) and the refer- ence lists of the included studies. We included any primary study design that focused on a population of women in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. Studies selection and data extraction were performed blindly and independently by two authors. We summarised the results narratively and used graphs and tables to present key concepts thematically. Results: We included 66 studies. We categorised the studies according to population, type of intervention, out- comes and user satisfaction. Most of the studies involved pathological (36%) and physiological (30%) pregnancy management, the type of intervention was mainly divided into televisits or video calls with professionals (43%) and the use of specific apps or devices (40%). The maternal outcomes studied were mainly quantitative, i.e., improvement in blood chemistry tests or vital parameters (65%) and treatment adherence (frequency of follow- up visits or keeping appointments, 27%). Patient satisfaction was positive in the majority of cases. Conclusions: There is still little international agreement on the concept and possible applications of telemedicine in obstetrics, although it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. Studies have shown positive results in terms of improved care, particularly in terms of treatment adherence and as an alternative strategy in the management of pregnancy, postpartum and abortion care. Both patients and health professionals were satisfied with it, especially when offered as a complement or alternative to the traditional method of face-to-face visits. Future developments seem to be the time and cost-saving potential of telemedicine and its application to couples’ infertility.
Exploring the impact of integrating telehealth in obstetric care: A scoping review
Tormen Mara
;Soraci Giulia;Taliento Cristina;Pantaleo Greco;Salvioli Stefano
2024
Abstract
Background: The use of telemedicine has spread to all areas of medicine, including obstetrics, over the last few decades. Objective: To identify and map the diversity and applicability of telemedicine in the obstetric literature, in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. To assess patient satisfaction and possible areas for future development. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and its extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched the databases PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), EMBASE Ovid and Scopus. We also searched Google Scholar, clinicaltrial.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP-WHO) and the refer- ence lists of the included studies. We included any primary study design that focused on a population of women in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. Studies selection and data extraction were performed blindly and independently by two authors. We summarised the results narratively and used graphs and tables to present key concepts thematically. Results: We included 66 studies. We categorised the studies according to population, type of intervention, out- comes and user satisfaction. Most of the studies involved pathological (36%) and physiological (30%) pregnancy management, the type of intervention was mainly divided into televisits or video calls with professionals (43%) and the use of specific apps or devices (40%). The maternal outcomes studied were mainly quantitative, i.e., improvement in blood chemistry tests or vital parameters (65%) and treatment adherence (frequency of follow- up visits or keeping appointments, 27%). Patient satisfaction was positive in the majority of cases. Conclusions: There is still little international agreement on the concept and possible applications of telemedicine in obstetrics, although it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. Studies have shown positive results in terms of improved care, particularly in terms of treatment adherence and as an alternative strategy in the management of pregnancy, postpartum and abortion care. Both patients and health professionals were satisfied with it, especially when offered as a complement or alternative to the traditional method of face-to-face visits. Future developments seem to be the time and cost-saving potential of telemedicine and its application to couples’ infertility.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.