We present the results of the first dating study of site P13 at Pirro Nord, Italy, which documents some of the earliest evidence for hominin presence in western Europe. Our multi-technique dating approach is based on a combination of palaeomagnetism, electron spin resonance (ESR), thermally-transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) and combined U-series/ESR applied to both fossil material and host sediment, which provides ages ranging from 627 ± 59 to 1006 ± 126 ka, and clustering around 0.8 Ma. One additional fossil tooth collected from the nearby P10 site also returns an age within this range. Ordinarily, this outcome would naturally lend itself to the straightforward conclusion that Pirro Nord has a late Early Pleistocene age of ∼0.8 Ma. However, this interpretation is complicated by the fact that these numerical dating results are in contradiction with the biochronological evidence, which suggests a much older age on the order of 1.3–1.7 Ma.
Re-examining the earliest evidence of human presence in western Europe: New dating results from Pirro Nord (Italy)
Bahain, Jean-Jacques;Arnaud, JulieMembro del Collaboration Group
;Berto, ClaudioConceptualization
;Daffara, Sara;Sala, BenedettoPenultimo
;Arzarello, MartaUltimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2024
Abstract
We present the results of the first dating study of site P13 at Pirro Nord, Italy, which documents some of the earliest evidence for hominin presence in western Europe. Our multi-technique dating approach is based on a combination of palaeomagnetism, electron spin resonance (ESR), thermally-transferred optically stimulated luminescence (TT-OSL) and combined U-series/ESR applied to both fossil material and host sediment, which provides ages ranging from 627 ± 59 to 1006 ± 126 ka, and clustering around 0.8 Ma. One additional fossil tooth collected from the nearby P10 site also returns an age within this range. Ordinarily, this outcome would naturally lend itself to the straightforward conclusion that Pirro Nord has a late Early Pleistocene age of ∼0.8 Ma. However, this interpretation is complicated by the fact that these numerical dating results are in contradiction with the biochronological evidence, which suggests a much older age on the order of 1.3–1.7 Ma.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S1871101424000232-main.pdf
embargo fino al 25/03/2026
Descrizione: Post-print
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.36 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
1-s2.0-S1871101424000232-main.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
5.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


