The ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures has recently published consensus-based guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of neonatal seizures (https://www.ilae.org/guidelines/guidelines-and-reports/treatment-of-seizures-in-the-neonateguidelines-and-consensus-based-recommendations). The Task Force suggests that a trial of pyridoxine should be provided as an add-on to ASM (antiseizures medications) treatment in neonates with seizures of unidentified etiology that are unresponsive to second-line ASM. Both daily clinical practice (including our experience with three patients with pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy [PDE]) and published literature support the possibility that patients with vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy may show an initial response to common ASMs, but can relapse with status epilepticus later in life. A brief review of the literature revealed 53 reports of newborns with seizures that showed initial response to first- and second-line ASMs including phenobarbital, phenytoin, midazolam, levetiracetam, and valproic acid. These same patients relapsed with seizures and in some cases with status epilepticus later in life and were diagnosed with PDEs.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] We are aware that PDE is an extremely rare condition that can mimic other more common causes for neonatal seizures and that pyridoxine's administration is not devoid of side effects, although rare, preventable, and known. Nevertheless, based on the above evidence, we believe that postponing pyridoxine administration and restricting its use only as an add-on therapy to ASMs in treatment unresponsive patients might lead to a dramatic delay in PDE. We believe that there is an urgent need to addend these guidelines after thoroughly examining this matter to at least cite the possibility of missing an early PDE diagnosis and to consider the possibility of suggesting a trial of pyridoxine in all patients with seizures of unknown etiology as first-line treatment even before ASM administration, especially in newborns presenting with clinical and/or electroencephalography features suggestive of PDE.

Early Pyridoxine Administration to Avoid Late Diagnosis of Pyridoxine-Dependent Epilepsy; Comment on the ILAE Guidelines Proposal on the Treatment of Seizures in the Neonate

Falsaperla, Raffaele
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

The ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures has recently published consensus-based guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of neonatal seizures (https://www.ilae.org/guidelines/guidelines-and-reports/treatment-of-seizures-in-the-neonateguidelines-and-consensus-based-recommendations). The Task Force suggests that a trial of pyridoxine should be provided as an add-on to ASM (antiseizures medications) treatment in neonates with seizures of unidentified etiology that are unresponsive to second-line ASM. Both daily clinical practice (including our experience with three patients with pyridoxine-dependent epilepsy [PDE]) and published literature support the possibility that patients with vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy may show an initial response to common ASMs, but can relapse with status epilepticus later in life. A brief review of the literature revealed 53 reports of newborns with seizures that showed initial response to first- and second-line ASMs including phenobarbital, phenytoin, midazolam, levetiracetam, and valproic acid. These same patients relapsed with seizures and in some cases with status epilepticus later in life and were diagnosed with PDEs.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] We are aware that PDE is an extremely rare condition that can mimic other more common causes for neonatal seizures and that pyridoxine's administration is not devoid of side effects, although rare, preventable, and known. Nevertheless, based on the above evidence, we believe that postponing pyridoxine administration and restricting its use only as an add-on therapy to ASMs in treatment unresponsive patients might lead to a dramatic delay in PDE. We believe that there is an urgent need to addend these guidelines after thoroughly examining this matter to at least cite the possibility of missing an early PDE diagnosis and to consider the possibility of suggesting a trial of pyridoxine in all patients with seizures of unknown etiology as first-line treatment even before ASM administration, especially in newborns presenting with clinical and/or electroencephalography features suggestive of PDE.
2024
Scalia, Bruna; Falsaperla, Raffaele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JPE_2300018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 68.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
68.8 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2538199
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact