Objectives: To comparatively evaluate the 6-year outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation (tSFE and lSFE, respectively).Methods: The 54 patients representing the per-protocol population of a randomized trial comparing implant placement with simultaneous tSFE versus lSFE at sites with a residual bone height of 3-6 mm were invited to participate in the 6-year follow-up visit. Study assessments included: peri-implant marginal bone level at the mesial (mMBL) and distal (dMBL) aspects of the implant, proportion of the entire implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area (totCON%), probing depth, bleeding on probing, suppuration on probing, and modified plaque index. Also, the conditions of the peri-implant tissues at 6-year visit were diagnosed according to the case definitions of peri-implant health, mucositis, and peri-implantitis from the 2017 World Workshop.Results: Forty-three patients (21 treated with tSFE and 22 treated with lSFE) participated in the 6-year visit. Implant survival was 100%. At 6 years, totCON% was 96% (IR: 88%-100%) in tSFE group and 100% (IR: 98%-100%) in lSFE group (p = .036). No significant intergroup difference in patient distribution according to the diagnosis of peri-implant health/disease was observed. Median dMBL was 0.3 mm in tSFE group and 0 mm in lSFE group (p = .024).Conclusions: At 6 years following placement concomitantly with tSFE and lSFE, implants showed similar conditions of peri-implant health. Peri-implant bone support was high in both groups and was slightly but significantly lower in tSFE group.

Six-year extension results of a randomized trial comparing transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation at sites with 3-6 mm of residual bone

Farina, Roberto
Primo
Conceptualization
;
Riccardi, Orio
Secondo
Investigation
;
Schincaglia, Gian Pietro
Investigation
;
Severi, Mattia
Data Curation
;
Trombelli, Leonardo
Penultimo
Supervision
;
Simonelli, Anna
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2023

Abstract

Objectives: To comparatively evaluate the 6-year outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation (tSFE and lSFE, respectively).Methods: The 54 patients representing the per-protocol population of a randomized trial comparing implant placement with simultaneous tSFE versus lSFE at sites with a residual bone height of 3-6 mm were invited to participate in the 6-year follow-up visit. Study assessments included: peri-implant marginal bone level at the mesial (mMBL) and distal (dMBL) aspects of the implant, proportion of the entire implant surface in direct contact with the radiopaque area (totCON%), probing depth, bleeding on probing, suppuration on probing, and modified plaque index. Also, the conditions of the peri-implant tissues at 6-year visit were diagnosed according to the case definitions of peri-implant health, mucositis, and peri-implantitis from the 2017 World Workshop.Results: Forty-three patients (21 treated with tSFE and 22 treated with lSFE) participated in the 6-year visit. Implant survival was 100%. At 6 years, totCON% was 96% (IR: 88%-100%) in tSFE group and 100% (IR: 98%-100%) in lSFE group (p = .036). No significant intergroup difference in patient distribution according to the diagnosis of peri-implant health/disease was observed. Median dMBL was 0.3 mm in tSFE group and 0 mm in lSFE group (p = .024).Conclusions: At 6 years following placement concomitantly with tSFE and lSFE, implants showed similar conditions of peri-implant health. Peri-implant bone support was high in both groups and was slightly but significantly lower in tSFE group.
2023
Farina, Roberto; Riccardi, Orio; Schincaglia, Gian Pietro; Severi, Mattia; Trombelli, Leonardo; Simonelli, Anna
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Farina et al 2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2525090
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact