A class of tests due to Shoemaker (Commun Stat Simul Comput 28: 189-205, 1999) for differences in scale which is valid for a variety of both skewed and symmetric distributions when location is known or unknown is considered. The class is based on the interquantile range and requires that the population variances are finite. In this paper, we firstly propose a permutation version of it that does not require the condition of finite variances and is remarkably more powerful than the original one. Secondly we solve the question of what quantile choose by proposing a combined interquantile test based on our permutation version of Shoemaker tests. Shoemaker showed that the more extreme interquantile range tests are more powerful than the less extreme ones, unless the underlying distributions are very highly skewed. Since in practice you may not know if the underlying distributions are very highly skewed or not, the question arises. The combined interquantile test solves this question, is robust and more powerful than the stand alone tests. Thirdly we conducted a much more detailed simulation study than that of Shoemaker (1999) that compared his tests to the F and the squared rank tests showing that his tests are better. Since the F and the squared rank test are not good for differences in scale, his results suffer of such a drawback, and for this reason instead of considering the squared rank test we consider, following the suggestions of several authors, tests due to Brown-Forsythe (J Am Stat Assoc 69:364-367, 1974), Pan (J Stat Comput Simul 63:59-71, 1999), O'Brien (J Am Stat Assoc 74:877-880, 1979) and Conover et al. (Technometrics 23:351-361, 1981). © 2010 Springer-Verlag.
A combined test for differences in scale based on the interquantile range
MAROZZI, Marco
2012
Abstract
A class of tests due to Shoemaker (Commun Stat Simul Comput 28: 189-205, 1999) for differences in scale which is valid for a variety of both skewed and symmetric distributions when location is known or unknown is considered. The class is based on the interquantile range and requires that the population variances are finite. In this paper, we firstly propose a permutation version of it that does not require the condition of finite variances and is remarkably more powerful than the original one. Secondly we solve the question of what quantile choose by proposing a combined interquantile test based on our permutation version of Shoemaker tests. Shoemaker showed that the more extreme interquantile range tests are more powerful than the less extreme ones, unless the underlying distributions are very highly skewed. Since in practice you may not know if the underlying distributions are very highly skewed or not, the question arises. The combined interquantile test solves this question, is robust and more powerful than the stand alone tests. Thirdly we conducted a much more detailed simulation study than that of Shoemaker (1999) that compared his tests to the F and the squared rank tests showing that his tests are better. Since the F and the squared rank test are not good for differences in scale, his results suffer of such a drawback, and for this reason instead of considering the squared rank test we consider, following the suggestions of several authors, tests due to Brown-Forsythe (J Am Stat Assoc 69:364-367, 1974), Pan (J Stat Comput Simul 63:59-71, 1999), O'Brien (J Am Stat Assoc 74:877-880, 1979) and Conover et al. (Technometrics 23:351-361, 1981). © 2010 Springer-Verlag.I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.