The first form of suspension of EU funds appeared with Article 88 of the ECSC Treaty. After a brief anal-ysis of that 'old-yet-modern' provision and of its application, this article discusses the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2020/2092 (the Conditionality Regulation) in the light of its historical ‘precedent’. In par-ticular, the research focuses on the discretion of the Commission (as well as on its justiciability by means of an action for failure to act) and on the limits of the scrutiny of the Court of Justice on the measures which will be adopted and, potentially, contested on the basis of the Conditionality Regulation.
Così antico, così moderno. Una lettura del “Regolamento condizionalità” alla luce del potere di sospensione dei fondi comunitari ex art. 88 del trattato CECA
Alberti J
Primo
2022
Abstract
The first form of suspension of EU funds appeared with Article 88 of the ECSC Treaty. After a brief anal-ysis of that 'old-yet-modern' provision and of its application, this article discusses the Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2020/2092 (the Conditionality Regulation) in the light of its historical ‘precedent’. In par-ticular, the research focuses on the discretion of the Commission (as well as on its justiciability by means of an action for failure to act) and on the limits of the scrutiny of the Court of Justice on the measures which will be adopted and, potentially, contested on the basis of the Conditionality Regulation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
OSF 1_2022 Alberti.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione
245.29 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
245.29 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.