Background & Aims: Knowledge of pre-operative tumour grade is crucial in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because it can influence recurrence and survival after surgery. The accuracy of pre-operative needle core biopsy (NCB) in tumour grading has been assessed in only a few studies with conflicting results. Our aim was to determine the long-term safety and the overall accuracy of NCB in assessing tumour grading in subjects who had undergone liver resection for a single HCC. Methods: Eighty-one cirrhotic patients with HCC who had undergone NCB before liver resection were selected. Only patients with a single HCC and with at least a five-year-follow-up were included. Tumour grading was scored according to a modified Edmondson-Steiner classification: well/moderately (low grade) vs poorly-differentiated (high grade). Results: In the 81 patients with a solitary HCC (mean size 4.1 ± 2.3 cm) tumour grade was correctly identified by NCB in 74 out of 81 (91.4%) HCCs. NCB overall sensitivity and specificity were 65% and 98.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 92% and an NPV of 91%. No major complications (in particular tumour seeding) were observed. The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 62%, and 44%, respectively; the recurrence rate after a 5-year-follow-up was 56.2% for low grade and 82.3% for high grade tumours (p <0.007). Conclusions: Pre-operative NCB can be performed on early (<5 cm) HCC cirrhotic patients because it provides histologically useful information for HCC management with good accuracy and a low complication rate.

Pre-operative liver biopsy in cirrhotic patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma represents a safe and accurate diagnostic tool for tumor grading assessment

GRAZI, GIAN LUCA
Penultimo
;
2011

Abstract

Background & Aims: Knowledge of pre-operative tumour grade is crucial in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) because it can influence recurrence and survival after surgery. The accuracy of pre-operative needle core biopsy (NCB) in tumour grading has been assessed in only a few studies with conflicting results. Our aim was to determine the long-term safety and the overall accuracy of NCB in assessing tumour grading in subjects who had undergone liver resection for a single HCC. Methods: Eighty-one cirrhotic patients with HCC who had undergone NCB before liver resection were selected. Only patients with a single HCC and with at least a five-year-follow-up were included. Tumour grading was scored according to a modified Edmondson-Steiner classification: well/moderately (low grade) vs poorly-differentiated (high grade). Results: In the 81 patients with a solitary HCC (mean size 4.1 ± 2.3 cm) tumour grade was correctly identified by NCB in 74 out of 81 (91.4%) HCCs. NCB overall sensitivity and specificity were 65% and 98.1%, respectively, with a PPV of 92% and an NPV of 91%. No major complications (in particular tumour seeding) were observed. The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83%, 62%, and 44%, respectively; the recurrence rate after a 5-year-follow-up was 56.2% for low grade and 82.3% for high grade tumours (p <0.007). Conclusions: Pre-operative NCB can be performed on early (<5 cm) HCC cirrhotic patients because it provides histologically useful information for HCC management with good accuracy and a low complication rate.
2011
Colecchia, Antonio; Scaioli, Eleonora; Montrone, Lucia; Vestito, Amanda; A. R., Di Biase; M., Pieri; D'Errico, Antonietta; BACCHI REGGIANI, MARIA LETIZIA; Ravaioli, Matteo; Grazi, GIAN LUCA; Festi, Davide
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0168827810007877-main.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 606.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
606.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2499797
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact