Background: Polypharmacy has been associated with worse cognitive performance, but its impact on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression to dementia has not been explored. Aims: The aims of the study were to investigate the association between multidrug regimens and MCI progression, and the possible mediation of drug–drug interactions and drugs’ anticholinergic effect in such association. Methods: This work included 342 older adults with MCI, who were involved in an Italian multicenter population-based cohort study. Information on drugs taken was derived from general practitioners’ records and data on drug–drug interactions and anticholinergic burden [evaluated through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS)] were extracted. Multinomial logistic regressions assessed the associations between mild polypharmacy (≥ 3 drugs/day), drug–drug interactions, and anticholinergic burden with MCI changes after 1-year follow-up. Mediation analysis evaluated potential mediators of that relationship. Results: Approximately, 50% of participants took ≥ 3 drugs/day. During the follow-up, 4.1% of MCI patients progressed to dementia. The odds of developing dementia was sixfold higher in those who took ≥ 3drugs/day (OR = 6.04, 95% CI 1.19–30.74), eightfold higher in those with ≥ 1 drug–drug interaction/s (OR = 8.45, 95% CI 1.70–41.91), and fivefold higher in those with ARS ≥ 1 (OR = 5.10, 95% CI 1.04–24.93). Drug–drug interactions mediated 70.4% of the association between medication number and MCI progression to dementia (p = 0.07). Discussion: Our study suggests that even mild polypharmacy may increase the risk of MCI progression to dementia, probably due to the presence of drug–drug interactions, which often occur in multidrug regimens. Conclusions: Older people require careful management of pharmacological treatments, with special attention to drug–drug interactions and drug-related anticholinergic effects.

Mild polypharmacy and MCI progression in older adults: the mediation effect of drug–drug interactions

Trevisan C.
Primo
;
2021

Abstract

Background: Polypharmacy has been associated with worse cognitive performance, but its impact on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progression to dementia has not been explored. Aims: The aims of the study were to investigate the association between multidrug regimens and MCI progression, and the possible mediation of drug–drug interactions and drugs’ anticholinergic effect in such association. Methods: This work included 342 older adults with MCI, who were involved in an Italian multicenter population-based cohort study. Information on drugs taken was derived from general practitioners’ records and data on drug–drug interactions and anticholinergic burden [evaluated through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS)] were extracted. Multinomial logistic regressions assessed the associations between mild polypharmacy (≥ 3 drugs/day), drug–drug interactions, and anticholinergic burden with MCI changes after 1-year follow-up. Mediation analysis evaluated potential mediators of that relationship. Results: Approximately, 50% of participants took ≥ 3 drugs/day. During the follow-up, 4.1% of MCI patients progressed to dementia. The odds of developing dementia was sixfold higher in those who took ≥ 3drugs/day (OR = 6.04, 95% CI 1.19–30.74), eightfold higher in those with ≥ 1 drug–drug interaction/s (OR = 8.45, 95% CI 1.70–41.91), and fivefold higher in those with ARS ≥ 1 (OR = 5.10, 95% CI 1.04–24.93). Drug–drug interactions mediated 70.4% of the association between medication number and MCI progression to dementia (p = 0.07). Discussion: Our study suggests that even mild polypharmacy may increase the risk of MCI progression to dementia, probably due to the presence of drug–drug interactions, which often occur in multidrug regimens. Conclusions: Older people require careful management of pharmacological treatments, with special attention to drug–drug interactions and drug-related anticholinergic effects.
2021
Trevisan, C.; Limongi, F.; Siviero, P.; Noale, M.; Cignarella, A.; Manzato, E.; Sergi, G.; Maggi, S.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s40520-019-01420-2.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 570.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
570.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2475439
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact