Serum uric acid (SUA) accounts for about 50% of extracellular antioxidant activity, suggesting that hyperuricemia may have a protective role in diseases characterized by high levels of oxidative stress, such as osteoporosis. We aimed to meta-analyse data regarding bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis and fractures in people with higher SUA vs. lower SUA concentrations. Materials and methods: Two investigators conducted a literature search using PubMed and Scopus, without language restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for BMD; risk ratios (RRs) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for cross-sectional data. Most possible adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the association between baseline SUA and incident fractures. Results: Of 1405 initial hits, 19 studies were eligible including a total of 55 859 participants. Subjects with higher SUA levels had significantly higher BMD values for the spine (six studies; SMD = 0·29; 95% CI: 0·22–0·35; I2 = 47%), total hip (seven studies; SMD = 0·29; 95% CI: 0·24–0·34; I2 = 33%) and femoral neck (six studies; SMD = 0·25; 95% CI: 0·16–0·34; I2 = 71%). Simple correlation analyses substantially confirmed these findings. An increase of one standard deviation in SUA levels reduced the number of new fractures at follow-up (three studies; HR = 0·83; 95% CI: 0·74–0·92; I2 = 0%). No significant differences between men and women emerged, although data about women were limited. Conclusions: Hyperuricemia was found independently associated with BMD and fractures, supporting a protective role for uric acid in bone metabolism disorders.

Hyperuricemia protects against low bone mineral density, osteoporosis and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Trevisan, Caterina;
2016

Abstract

Serum uric acid (SUA) accounts for about 50% of extracellular antioxidant activity, suggesting that hyperuricemia may have a protective role in diseases characterized by high levels of oxidative stress, such as osteoporosis. We aimed to meta-analyse data regarding bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis and fractures in people with higher SUA vs. lower SUA concentrations. Materials and methods: Two investigators conducted a literature search using PubMed and Scopus, without language restrictions. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for BMD; risk ratios (RRs) and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for cross-sectional data. Most possible adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the association between baseline SUA and incident fractures. Results: Of 1405 initial hits, 19 studies were eligible including a total of 55 859 participants. Subjects with higher SUA levels had significantly higher BMD values for the spine (six studies; SMD = 0·29; 95% CI: 0·22–0·35; I2 = 47%), total hip (seven studies; SMD = 0·29; 95% CI: 0·24–0·34; I2 = 33%) and femoral neck (six studies; SMD = 0·25; 95% CI: 0·16–0·34; I2 = 71%). Simple correlation analyses substantially confirmed these findings. An increase of one standard deviation in SUA levels reduced the number of new fractures at follow-up (three studies; HR = 0·83; 95% CI: 0·74–0·92; I2 = 0%). No significant differences between men and women emerged, although data about women were limited. Conclusions: Hyperuricemia was found independently associated with BMD and fractures, supporting a protective role for uric acid in bone metabolism disorders.
2016
Veronese, Nicola; Carraro, Sara; Bano, Giulia; Trevisan, Caterina; Solmi, Marco; Luchini, Claudio; Manzato, Enzo; Caccialanza, Riccardo; Sergi, Giusep...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2475391
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 23
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact