Aim Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is unclear, and its association with adverse outcomes is often overlooked. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of COPD, its impact on clinical management and outcomes in patients with AF, and the impact of beta-blockers (BBs) on outcomes in patients with COPD Methods and results A systematic review and meta-Analysis was conducted according to international guidelines. All studies reporting the prevalence of COPD in AF patients were included. Data on comorbidities, BBs and oral anticoagulant prescription, and outcomes (all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding) were compared according to COPD and BB status. Among 46 studies, pooled prevalence of COPD was 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 10 16%, 95% prediction interval 2 47%]. COPD was associated with higher prevalence of comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score and lower BB prescription [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 0.98]. COPD was associated with higher risk of all-cause death (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.93 2.55), CV death (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.39 2.43), and major bleeding (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 1.80); no significant differences in outcomes were observed according to BB use in AF patients with COPD. Conclusion COPD is common in AF, being found in 13% of patients, and is associated with increased burden of comorbidities, differential management, and worse outcomes, with more than a two-fold higher risk of all-cause death and increased risk of CV death and major bleeding. Therapy with BBs does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AF and COPD.

Prevalence, management and impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-Analysis of 4,200,000 patients

Raparelli V.;
2021

Abstract

Aim Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is unclear, and its association with adverse outcomes is often overlooked. Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of COPD, its impact on clinical management and outcomes in patients with AF, and the impact of beta-blockers (BBs) on outcomes in patients with COPD Methods and results A systematic review and meta-Analysis was conducted according to international guidelines. All studies reporting the prevalence of COPD in AF patients were included. Data on comorbidities, BBs and oral anticoagulant prescription, and outcomes (all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, ischaemic stroke, major bleeding) were compared according to COPD and BB status. Among 46 studies, pooled prevalence of COPD was 13% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 10 16%, 95% prediction interval 2 47%]. COPD was associated with higher prevalence of comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score and lower BB prescription [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 0.98]. COPD was associated with higher risk of all-cause death (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.93 2.55), CV death (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.39 2.43), and major bleeding (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.17 1.80); no significant differences in outcomes were observed according to BB use in AF patients with COPD. Conclusion COPD is common in AF, being found in 13% of patients, and is associated with increased burden of comorbidities, differential management, and worse outcomes, with more than a two-fold higher risk of all-cause death and increased risk of CV death and major bleeding. Therapy with BBs does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AF and COPD.
2021
Romiti, G. F.; Corica, B.; Pipitone, E.; Vitolo, M.; Raparelli, V.; Basili, S.; Boriani, G.; Harari, S.; Lip, G. Y. H.; Proietti, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021_RomitiGF_ehab453.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2473729
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 37
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact