The optimal stem cell (SC) mobilization strategy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains a matter of debate. Possible approaches include low or high doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy), other chemotherapeutic agents, or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. The scope of the study was to compare low-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus intermediate-high-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone for SC mobilization in MM, in terms of efficacy and safety. We retrospectively analyzed 422 MM patients undergoing SC mobilization in 6 Italian centers, including 188 patients who received low-dose Cy (LD-Cy group, defined as 2 g/m2), 163 patients who received intermediate-high-dose Cy (HD-Cy group, defined as 3 g/m2 ), and 71 patients who received G-CSF alone (G-CSF group). The median peak of circulating CD34+ cells was 77/mL in the LD-Cy group, 92/mL in the HD-Cy group, and 55/mL in the G-CSF group (P = .0001). The median amount of SCs collected was 9.1 £ 106 /kg, 9.7 £ 106/kg, and 5.6 £ 106/kg in the 3 groups, respectively (P = .0001). The rate of mobilization failure (defined as failure to collect 2 £ 106/kg) was 3.7% in the LD-Cy group, 3.4% in the HD-Cy group, and 4.3% in the G-CSF group (P = .9). The target SC dose of at least 4 £ 106/kg was reached in 90.4%, 91.1%, and 78.6% of the patients in these 3 groups, respectively (P = .014). The “on demand” use of plerixafor was higher in the G-CSF group (76%) compared with the LD-Cy group (19%) and the HD-Cy group (6%). In multivariate analysis, G-CSF mobilization and previous use of melphalan or radiotherapy were independently associated with failure to collect the target SC dose of 4 £ 106/kg. No impacts of age, blood counts, or previous treatment with lenalidomide, bortezomib, or carfilzomib were observed. Our results suggest that LD-Cy may be considered for successful SC mobilization in patients with MM.

Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Intermediate-High-Dose Cyclophosphamide versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Lanza, Francesco
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2021

Abstract

The optimal stem cell (SC) mobilization strategy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains a matter of debate. Possible approaches include low or high doses of cyclophosphamide (Cy), other chemotherapeutic agents, or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone. The scope of the study was to compare low-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus intermediate-high-dose Cy plus G-CSF versus G-CSF alone for SC mobilization in MM, in terms of efficacy and safety. We retrospectively analyzed 422 MM patients undergoing SC mobilization in 6 Italian centers, including 188 patients who received low-dose Cy (LD-Cy group, defined as 2 g/m2), 163 patients who received intermediate-high-dose Cy (HD-Cy group, defined as 3 g/m2 ), and 71 patients who received G-CSF alone (G-CSF group). The median peak of circulating CD34+ cells was 77/mL in the LD-Cy group, 92/mL in the HD-Cy group, and 55/mL in the G-CSF group (P = .0001). The median amount of SCs collected was 9.1 £ 106 /kg, 9.7 £ 106/kg, and 5.6 £ 106/kg in the 3 groups, respectively (P = .0001). The rate of mobilization failure (defined as failure to collect 2 £ 106/kg) was 3.7% in the LD-Cy group, 3.4% in the HD-Cy group, and 4.3% in the G-CSF group (P = .9). The target SC dose of at least 4 £ 106/kg was reached in 90.4%, 91.1%, and 78.6% of the patients in these 3 groups, respectively (P = .014). The “on demand” use of plerixafor was higher in the G-CSF group (76%) compared with the LD-Cy group (19%) and the HD-Cy group (6%). In multivariate analysis, G-CSF mobilization and previous use of melphalan or radiotherapy were independently associated with failure to collect the target SC dose of 4 £ 106/kg. No impacts of age, blood counts, or previous treatment with lenalidomide, bortezomib, or carfilzomib were observed. Our results suggest that LD-Cy may be considered for successful SC mobilization in patients with MM.
2021
Zannetti, Beatrice Anna; Saraceni, Francesco; Cellini, Claudia; Fabbri, Elisabetta; Monaco, Federica; Guarini, Attilio; Laszlo, Daniele; Martino, Massimo; Olivieri, Attilio; Imola, Manuela; Tosi, Patrizia; Chiarucci, Martina; Zuffa, Eliana; Lanza, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BBMT 2021_ Zannetti.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Article in press
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 383.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S2666636720300531-main.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 455.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
455.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2437751
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact