Purpose: The study aims to understand how digital technologies impact firm’s innovativeness and intellectual capital creation. Precisely, we argue that digital technologies exert a positive influence on firm’s intellectual property, but the relationship is inverse u-shaped. Design/methodology/approach: Hypotheses are tested through the multiple regression method on a large-scale sample of micro-data drawn from Eurostat. The dataset includes information on European firms. Findings: At large, evidences seem to confirm that digital technologies may have a positive influence on the creation of intellectual capital and innovativeness of firms. However, the results also suggest that this relationship is not straightforward. By contrast, it seems more inverse u-shaped. Also, some components related to both human capital and relational capital hinder the creation of firm’s intellectual capital. Research limitations/implications:. The use of a sample exclusively including European firms might limit the span of the research’s results, albeit European Union might be considered a champion of the diffusion of digital technologies. Practical implications: Practitioners may use the findings of the study to foster the creation of intellectual property and to remove barriers to innovativeness. Originality/value:

Are digital technologies killing future innovation? The curvilinear relationship between digital technologies and firm's intellectual property

Beatrice Orlando
Primo
;
2021

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to understand how digital technologies impact firm’s innovativeness and intellectual capital creation. Precisely, we argue that digital technologies exert a positive influence on firm’s intellectual property, but the relationship is inverse u-shaped. Design/methodology/approach: Hypotheses are tested through the multiple regression method on a large-scale sample of micro-data drawn from Eurostat. The dataset includes information on European firms. Findings: At large, evidences seem to confirm that digital technologies may have a positive influence on the creation of intellectual capital and innovativeness of firms. However, the results also suggest that this relationship is not straightforward. By contrast, it seems more inverse u-shaped. Also, some components related to both human capital and relational capital hinder the creation of firm’s intellectual capital. Research limitations/implications:. The use of a sample exclusively including European firms might limit the span of the research’s results, albeit European Union might be considered a champion of the diffusion of digital technologies. Practical implications: Practitioners may use the findings of the study to foster the creation of intellectual property and to remove barriers to innovativeness. Originality/value:
2021
Orlando, Beatrice; Mazzucchelli, Alice; Usai, Antonio; Nicotra, Melita; Paoletti, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JIC-03-2020-0078.R3_JIC are digital.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Pre print
Tipologia: Pre-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 543.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
543.61 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
10-1108_JIC-03-2020-0078.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 799.49 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
799.49 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2425788
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact