Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size—and at times, direction—of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change—willingness to work in solidarity— that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.

A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change

Visintin E. P.;
2020

Abstract

Guided by the early findings of social scientists, practitioners have long advocated for greater contact between groups to reduce prejudice and increase social cohesion. Recent work, however, suggests that intergroup contact can undermine support for social change towards greater equality, especially among disadvantaged group members. Using a large and heterogeneous dataset (12,997 individuals from 69 countries), we demonstrate that intergroup contact and support for social change towards greater equality are positively associated among members of advantaged groups (ethnic majorities and cis-heterosexuals) but negatively associated among disadvantaged groups (ethnic minorities and sexual and gender minorities). Specification-curve analysis revealed important variation in the size—and at times, direction—of correlations, depending on how contact and support for social change were measured. This allowed us to identify one type of support for change—willingness to work in solidarity— that is positively associated with intergroup contact among both advantaged and disadvantaged group members.
2020
Hassler, Tabea; Ullrich, Johannes; Bernardino, Michelle; Shnabel, Nurit; Van Laar, Colette.; Valdenegro, Daniel; Sebben, Simone; Tropp Linda, R.; Visintin, E. P.; Gonzalez, Roberto; Ditlmann Ruth, K.; Abrams, Dominic; Selvanathan Hema, Preya; Brankovic, Marija; Wright, Stephen; von Zimmermann, Jorina; Pasek, Michael; Aydin Anna, Lica; Zezelj, Iris; Pereira, Adrienne; Lantos Nora, Anna; Sainz, Mario; Glenz, Andreas; Oberpfalzerova, Hana; Bilewicz, Michal; Kende, Anna; Kuzawinska, Olga; Otten, Sabine; Maloku, Edona; Noor, Masi; Gul, Pelin; Pistella, Jessica; Baiocco, Roberto; Jelic, Margareta; Osin, Evgeny; Bareket, Orly; Biruski Dinka, Corkalo; Cook Jonathan, E.; Dawood, Maneeza; Droogendyk, Lisa; Herrera Loyo, Angelica; Kelmendi, Kaltrina; Ugarte Luiza, Mugnol
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Haessler_et_al_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
post-peer-review_Haessler_et_al_nr_Manuscript_Embargo (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Post-print
Tipologia: Post-print
Licenza: PUBBLICO - Pubblico con Copyright
Dimensione 162.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
162.32 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2424838
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 103
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 94
social impact