AimThe aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a disposable gauze soaked with chlorhexidine and rolled up on the finger vs chlorhexidine mouth rinse (CM) to maintain oral hygiene.MethodsIn this single-blind, randomized trial, both groups were instructed to brush their teeth and use the 0.12% chlorhexidine intervention twice per day (experimental group: toothbrushing+chlorhexidine-soaked gauze; control group: toothbrushing+mouth rinse). The main outcome was the change in full mouth plaque index scores from baseline to 2weeks. Secondary outcomes were the patient's appreciation (visual analog scale) and the bleeding index.ResultsThe final sample consisted of 60 young patients: 31 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. After 2weeks, both interventions were effective in reducing plaque index. The percentage of score reduction was 33% in the experimental group and 30% for the controls, with no significant difference between groups. Both interventions reduced the bleeding index, but this reduction was significant only in the experimental group (P<.001).ConclusionsThere is no difference between chlorhexidine-soaked gauze and CM regarding plaque control. In addition, gauze soaked with chlorhexidine was significantly more effective in reducing the bleeding index score and was appreciated by the patients.

Assessment of antiplaque effectiveness of chlorhexidine-soaked gauze compared to chlorhexidine mouth rinse: Randomized clinical trial

Manzoli, Lamberto
Formal Analysis
;
2018

Abstract

AimThe aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of a disposable gauze soaked with chlorhexidine and rolled up on the finger vs chlorhexidine mouth rinse (CM) to maintain oral hygiene.MethodsIn this single-blind, randomized trial, both groups were instructed to brush their teeth and use the 0.12% chlorhexidine intervention twice per day (experimental group: toothbrushing+chlorhexidine-soaked gauze; control group: toothbrushing+mouth rinse). The main outcome was the change in full mouth plaque index scores from baseline to 2weeks. Secondary outcomes were the patient's appreciation (visual analog scale) and the bleeding index.ResultsThe final sample consisted of 60 young patients: 31 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. After 2weeks, both interventions were effective in reducing plaque index. The percentage of score reduction was 33% in the experimental group and 30% for the controls, with no significant difference between groups. Both interventions reduced the bleeding index, but this reduction was significant only in the experimental group (P<.001).ConclusionsThere is no difference between chlorhexidine-soaked gauze and CM regarding plaque control. In addition, gauze soaked with chlorhexidine was significantly more effective in reducing the bleeding index score and was appreciated by the patients.
2018
Sparabombe, Scilla; Roncati, Marisa; Monterubbianasi, Riccardo; Catellani, Alberto; Manzoli, Lamberto; Bambini, Fabrizio; Procaccini, Maurizio; Putign...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
14942558.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 305.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
305.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2395576
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact