Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in patients at low mobility with leg edema. Methods: A pilot, two-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients (age, 58.4 ± 9 years; male, 14), randomly allocated to a group (IPC) undergoing 1 month (n = 29) of an in-home cycle of IPC and to a control (C) group (n = 21), were studied. Leg edema was evaluated by measuring subcutaneous thickness (high-resolution ultrasound) and circumferences (metric tape), both assessed at different levels of the lower limbs, and volume (water plethysmography). Ankle range of motion (ROM, goniometer), quality of life (QoL) by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and a pool of plasma inflammatory markers were also evaluated. Results: Edema significantly decreased in the IPC group (for all outcome measures, P <.0001), whereas it significantly increased in the C group (P <.0001). Ankle ROM was significantly enhanced in the IPC group (dorsiflexion, P <.0001; plantar flexion, P =.002) and remained stable in the C group. QoL showed an improvement in the IPC group, particularly significant for the general health subscale (P =.004), whereas no changes were highlighted in the C group. The two groups exhibited different trends and variations for some plasma inflammatory markers, mainly for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Conclusions: In a sample of patients at reduced mobility with leg edema, IPC treatment was effective in reducing the edema, improving the ankle ROM, and determining a positive impact on QoL together with a slight modulation of some plasma inflammatory markers.
Effects of intermittent pneumatic compression treatment on clinical outcomes and biochemical markers in patients at low mobility with lower limb edema
Mirko Tessari
Primo
;Veronica TisatoSecondo
;Erika Rimondi;Paolo ZamboniPenultimo
;Anna Maria MalagoniUltimo
2018
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in patients at low mobility with leg edema. Methods: A pilot, two-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial was performed. Fifty patients (age, 58.4 ± 9 years; male, 14), randomly allocated to a group (IPC) undergoing 1 month (n = 29) of an in-home cycle of IPC and to a control (C) group (n = 21), were studied. Leg edema was evaluated by measuring subcutaneous thickness (high-resolution ultrasound) and circumferences (metric tape), both assessed at different levels of the lower limbs, and volume (water plethysmography). Ankle range of motion (ROM, goniometer), quality of life (QoL) by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and a pool of plasma inflammatory markers were also evaluated. Results: Edema significantly decreased in the IPC group (for all outcome measures, P <.0001), whereas it significantly increased in the C group (P <.0001). Ankle ROM was significantly enhanced in the IPC group (dorsiflexion, P <.0001; plantar flexion, P =.002) and remained stable in the C group. QoL showed an improvement in the IPC group, particularly significant for the general health subscale (P =.004), whereas no changes were highlighted in the C group. The two groups exhibited different trends and variations for some plasma inflammatory markers, mainly for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Conclusions: In a sample of patients at reduced mobility with leg edema, IPC treatment was effective in reducing the edema, improving the ankle ROM, and determining a positive impact on QoL together with a slight modulation of some plasma inflammatory markers.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tessari et al 2018 PDF.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
1.06 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.06 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.