Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the activity quantification of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT-CT) 90Y-Bremsstrahlung images and to validate the S-voxel method. Methods: An anthropomorphic torso phantom with radioactive inserts (90Y) was acquired by SPECT-CT. Constant calibration factors (cps/MBq) for the quantification were evaluated, considering different volume, shape, position inside the phantom, activity concentration and background, and distance from detectors. S-voxel values (EGSnrc) were implemented in MATLAB R0086 USA software. Dose comparisons between S-voxel and the conventional Medical Internal Radiation Dose method were repeated in a group of 11 patients administered with 90Y-DOTATATE. Results: Using the appropriate calibration factors to recover the volume variability, the error about the measurement repeatability and the activity variation was within 4%. The variability of activity quantification, depending on the position in the phantom, detector distance, and background, was <10%, <5%, and <10%, respectively. The absorbed-dose values calculated by OLINDA were in agreement with the mean dose values obtained by the S-voxel method (difference, <10%). Conclusions: The results confirm that, with the hybrid SPECT-CT system, quantitative analysis of SPECT 90Y-Bremsstrahlung images and the generation of three-dmensional dose distributions are feasible. The improved analysis of Bremsstrahlung images could have a notable clinical impact, allowing to address the dosimetric verification to patients during the course of therapy. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2009.

Quantitative analysis of 90Y Bremsstrahlung SPECT-CT images for application to 3D patient-specific dosimetry

Paganelli, Giovanni
2009

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the activity quantification of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT-CT) 90Y-Bremsstrahlung images and to validate the S-voxel method. Methods: An anthropomorphic torso phantom with radioactive inserts (90Y) was acquired by SPECT-CT. Constant calibration factors (cps/MBq) for the quantification were evaluated, considering different volume, shape, position inside the phantom, activity concentration and background, and distance from detectors. S-voxel values (EGSnrc) were implemented in MATLAB R0086 USA software. Dose comparisons between S-voxel and the conventional Medical Internal Radiation Dose method were repeated in a group of 11 patients administered with 90Y-DOTATATE. Results: Using the appropriate calibration factors to recover the volume variability, the error about the measurement repeatability and the activity variation was within 4%. The variability of activity quantification, depending on the position in the phantom, detector distance, and background, was <10%, <5%, and <10%, respectively. The absorbed-dose values calculated by OLINDA were in agreement with the mean dose values obtained by the S-voxel method (difference, <10%). Conclusions: The results confirm that, with the hybrid SPECT-CT system, quantitative analysis of SPECT 90Y-Bremsstrahlung images and the generation of three-dmensional dose distributions are feasible. The improved analysis of Bremsstrahlung images could have a notable clinical impact, allowing to address the dosimetric verification to patients during the course of therapy. © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2009.
2009
Fabbri, Cinzia; Sarti, Graziella; Cremonesi, Marta; Ferrari, Mahila; Dia, Amalia Di; Agostini, Monica; Botta, Francesca; Paganelli, Giovanni
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2383047
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 43
social impact