This article compares the features and attributes of the post 2013 Australian General Anti-Avoidance rule (GAAR) under a common law jurisdiction and the 2015 General Anti-abuse rule in Italy under a civil law jurisdiction. These selected GAARs are assessed and evaluated for their potential scope and impact via a number of criteria and benchmarks. While comparative elements and features are noted, the analysis finds that these particular GAARs will support their respective revenue authorities in tackling tax avoidance and abuse in future years.
A Comparison of Common law and Civil law GAARs: the cases of Australia and Italy
Devos, Ken
;Greggi, Marco
2016
Abstract
This article compares the features and attributes of the post 2013 Australian General Anti-Avoidance rule (GAAR) under a common law jurisdiction and the 2015 General Anti-abuse rule in Italy under a civil law jurisdiction. These selected GAARs are assessed and evaluated for their potential scope and impact via a number of criteria and benchmarks. While comparative elements and features are noted, the analysis finds that these particular GAARs will support their respective revenue authorities in tackling tax avoidance and abuse in future years.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
A_Comparison_of_Common_law_and_Civil_law.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: post print
Tipologia:
Post-print
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
197.04 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
197.04 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
GREGGI.2382005.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
834.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
834.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.