The doctoral training – nowadays as far as in the past – should deeply understand the meanings of researching scenarios of innovation defined by sudden changes dued to a continuous availability of new technological innovations added to urgent social or market demands. The training should consider , especially in architectural technology design field, how in the past this kind of cultural challenges has been ruled by other main discipline scientists and which are the real resources and goals of the contemporay scientific research able to influence the future. Likewise the encouragement to a modernised creativity in researches topics based on the awareness of the new possibilities offered nowadays by available innovative material and immaterial technologies. Thinking that the doctoral training action is itself the result of a research path and a planning act for the future, lead us however – essentially – to spot pre-emptively the prevailing contemporary researchers skills required. The dissemination ability of the researcher into the global scientific community will be another important issue to manage. The quality of the research activity outcomes, in the future more than today, will be checked through the analysis of the scientific impacts mesaured in the global publishing science area, or better, in the ‘native’ scientific area of the researcher. From this angle, the researcher should bring out his best to build up his own prestige in the local, national and international scientific sphere; this will bound him frequently to consciously assume some risks in his actions. This last istinct is - in conclusion - one of the most appreciated ability in resarch work teams.
The importance of architectural technology background and originality in an effective scientific research process
ZAFFAGNINI, Theo
2017
Abstract
The doctoral training – nowadays as far as in the past – should deeply understand the meanings of researching scenarios of innovation defined by sudden changes dued to a continuous availability of new technological innovations added to urgent social or market demands. The training should consider , especially in architectural technology design field, how in the past this kind of cultural challenges has been ruled by other main discipline scientists and which are the real resources and goals of the contemporay scientific research able to influence the future. Likewise the encouragement to a modernised creativity in researches topics based on the awareness of the new possibilities offered nowadays by available innovative material and immaterial technologies. Thinking that the doctoral training action is itself the result of a research path and a planning act for the future, lead us however – essentially – to spot pre-emptively the prevailing contemporary researchers skills required. The dissemination ability of the researcher into the global scientific community will be another important issue to manage. The quality of the research activity outcomes, in the future more than today, will be checked through the analysis of the scientific impacts mesaured in the global publishing science area, or better, in the ‘native’ scientific area of the researcher. From this angle, the researcher should bring out his best to build up his own prestige in the local, national and international scientific sphere; this will bound him frequently to consciously assume some risks in his actions. This last istinct is - in conclusion - one of the most appreciated ability in resarch work teams.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2017_How_To_Face_the_scientific_communication_today_contributo.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Full text editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
837.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
837.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.