Aim: To evaluate sensitivity to different probiotics in children with cow's milk allergy. Methods: Eighty-five patients (age range: 4 months -12 years) presenting atopic dermatitis (AD) were enrolled. Skin prick test (SPT) responses to three different probiotics preparations (Fiorilac®, Dicoflor® and Reuterin®) were evaluated in addition to relevant food allergens. Results: Thirty-nine patients out of 85 (45.8%) had a positive skin response to prick test for cow's milk (3 with reaction [removed]3 mm, twenty-eight (77.8%) had a skin response to Fiorilac®, four patients (11%) to Dicoflor® and four (11%) to Reuterin®. The proportion of SPT reaction to all the investigated probiotics preparations was significantly lower than cow's milk (r = 9.406; p = 0.002). A significantly higher sensitization was observed for Fiorilac® versus Dicoflor® (r = 30.916; p < 0.001) and versus Reuterin® (r = 34.133; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Probiotic use in patients with cow's milk allergy has to be limited to products that do not contain milk. This should be clearly reported in the label. In selected patients, it is advisable to perform a screening SPT with the product to evaluate its potential contamination with milk.
Cow's milk allergic children can present sensitisation to probiotics
PERONI, Diego
;
2009
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate sensitivity to different probiotics in children with cow's milk allergy. Methods: Eighty-five patients (age range: 4 months -12 years) presenting atopic dermatitis (AD) were enrolled. Skin prick test (SPT) responses to three different probiotics preparations (Fiorilac®, Dicoflor® and Reuterin®) were evaluated in addition to relevant food allergens. Results: Thirty-nine patients out of 85 (45.8%) had a positive skin response to prick test for cow's milk (3 with reaction [removed]3 mm, twenty-eight (77.8%) had a skin response to Fiorilac®, four patients (11%) to Dicoflor® and four (11%) to Reuterin®. The proportion of SPT reaction to all the investigated probiotics preparations was significantly lower than cow's milk (r = 9.406; p = 0.002). A significantly higher sensitization was observed for Fiorilac® versus Dicoflor® (r = 30.916; p < 0.001) and versus Reuterin® (r = 34.133; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Probiotic use in patients with cow's milk allergy has to be limited to products that do not contain milk. This should be clearly reported in the label. In selected patients, it is advisable to perform a screening SPT with the product to evaluate its potential contamination with milk.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
bruni2008.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
104.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
104.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.