Background: The aim of this study was to compare the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) outpatients. Methods: The study included 1686 subjects, aged 68±10 years. GFR was evaluated with five different equations: GFRMDRD186, GFRMDRD175, GFRCKD-EPI, GFRMAYO, GFRCG. Results: GFR was lower than 60 ml min-1 kg-1 in 456 patients (27%) by GFRMDRD186, in 531 (31.5%) by GFRMDRD175, in 504 (30%) by GFRCKD-EPI, in 433 (26%) by GFRC-G, and in 255 (15%) by GFRMAYO. The mean differences in measuring GFR with the different formulae ranged from 1.03±6.20 to -14.5±11.9 ml min-1 1.73 m2-1. Conclusions: The evaluation of GFR with different formulae in type 2 DM patients may identify different chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages. Physicians could take advantage by the knowledge of the formula used for evaluation of renal function, for a better interpretation of values and a more appropriate use in the everyday clinical practice.

The estimation of glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetic patients may depend on the equation used,

FABBIAN, Fabio;PORTALUPPI, Francesco;MANFREDINI, Roberto
2013

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) outpatients. Methods: The study included 1686 subjects, aged 68±10 years. GFR was evaluated with five different equations: GFRMDRD186, GFRMDRD175, GFRCKD-EPI, GFRMAYO, GFRCG. Results: GFR was lower than 60 ml min-1 kg-1 in 456 patients (27%) by GFRMDRD186, in 531 (31.5%) by GFRMDRD175, in 504 (30%) by GFRCKD-EPI, in 433 (26%) by GFRC-G, and in 255 (15%) by GFRMAYO. The mean differences in measuring GFR with the different formulae ranged from 1.03±6.20 to -14.5±11.9 ml min-1 1.73 m2-1. Conclusions: The evaluation of GFR with different formulae in type 2 DM patients may identify different chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages. Physicians could take advantage by the knowledge of the formula used for evaluation of renal function, for a better interpretation of values and a more appropriate use in the everyday clinical practice.
2013
Fabbian, Fabio; Pala, M.; Monesi, M.; De Giorgi, A.; Mallozzi Menegatti, A.; Tomasi, F.; Portaluppi, Francesco; Manfredini, Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/1870918
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact