In the last decade, some investigations have reported that the resorbable blast media surface (also named CaPO4 blasted implants [CaPO4-Bls]) has achieved excellent results. However, no report regarding CaPO4-Bls inserted into fresh frozen bone (FFB) is available. Thus, we planned a retrospective study on a series of CaPO4-Bls inserted into FFB to evaluate their clinical outcome. In the period between December 2003 and December 2006, 16 patients (10 females and 6 males, median age of 55 years) were operated on, and 76 CaPO4-Bls were inserted. The mean implant follow-up was 23 months. Implant diameter and length ranged from 3.25 to 4.5 mm and from 11.5 to 15 mm, respectively. Implants were inserted to replace 7 incisors, 11 cuspids, 31 premolars, and 27 molars. Only 1 out of 76 implants was lost (i.e., survival rate [SVR] = 98.7\%), and no differences were detected among the studied variables. When peri-implant crestal bone resorption was used as an indicator of clinical success (i.e., success rate), it was possible to identify some variables that correlated with a better clinical outcome. Specifically, Cox regression showed that removable prosthetic restoration and longer implant length correlated with a statistically significant lower delta implant abutment junction (IAJ; i.e., reduced crestal bone loss) and thus a better clinical outcome. In this study, CaPO4-Bls had high survival and success rates, similar to those reported in previous reports of 2-stage procedures in nongrafted bone. CaPO4-Bls inserted into FFB are reliable devices, although greater marginal bone loss occurs when fixed prosthetic restorations and short implants are used.

CaPO4 blasted implants inserted into iliac crest homologue frozen grafts

BRUNELLI, Giorgio;CARINCI, Francesco
2009

Abstract

In the last decade, some investigations have reported that the resorbable blast media surface (also named CaPO4 blasted implants [CaPO4-Bls]) has achieved excellent results. However, no report regarding CaPO4-Bls inserted into fresh frozen bone (FFB) is available. Thus, we planned a retrospective study on a series of CaPO4-Bls inserted into FFB to evaluate their clinical outcome. In the period between December 2003 and December 2006, 16 patients (10 females and 6 males, median age of 55 years) were operated on, and 76 CaPO4-Bls were inserted. The mean implant follow-up was 23 months. Implant diameter and length ranged from 3.25 to 4.5 mm and from 11.5 to 15 mm, respectively. Implants were inserted to replace 7 incisors, 11 cuspids, 31 premolars, and 27 molars. Only 1 out of 76 implants was lost (i.e., survival rate [SVR] = 98.7\%), and no differences were detected among the studied variables. When peri-implant crestal bone resorption was used as an indicator of clinical success (i.e., success rate), it was possible to identify some variables that correlated with a better clinical outcome. Specifically, Cox regression showed that removable prosthetic restoration and longer implant length correlated with a statistically significant lower delta implant abutment junction (IAJ; i.e., reduced crestal bone loss) and thus a better clinical outcome. In this study, CaPO4-Bls had high survival and success rates, similar to those reported in previous reports of 2-stage procedures in nongrafted bone. CaPO4-Bls inserted into FFB are reliable devices, although greater marginal bone loss occurs when fixed prosthetic restorations and short implants are used.
2009
M., Franco; L., Rigo; A., Viscione; B. D., Santis; E., Tropina; Brunelli, Giorgio; R., Guidi; A., Avantaggiato; Carinci, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/1398565
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact