This chapter examines how citizens and public administrators interpret the growing digitalisation and automation of public services, focusing on the relationship between digital government and public trust. Drawing on a mixed- methods research design, it combines survey data on citizens’ perceptions with qualitative interviews with civil servants. The findings show that citizens generally support digitalisation, particularly when it simplifies routine procedures and improves accessibility. However, attitudes toward AI- driven automation are more cautious, especially when systems are perceived as replacing human interaction. Trust does not emerge as a direct outcome of technological innovation but is shaped by citizens’ everyday experiences with public services, including usability, procedural clarity, and institutional capacity. Overall, the chapter highlights the relational foundations of trust in digitally mediated public administration.

This chapter examines how citizens and public administrators interpret the growing digitalisation andautomation of public services, focusing on the relationship between digital government and public trust. Drawing on a mixed-methods research design, it combines survey data on citizens’ perceptions with qualitative interviews with civil servants. The findings show that citizens generally support digitalisation, particularly when it simplifies routine procedures and improves accessibility. However, attitudes toward AI-driven automation are more cautious, especially when systems are perceived as replacing human interaction. Trust does not emerge as a direct outcome of technological innovation but is shaped by citizens’ everyday experiences with public services, including usability, procedural clarity, and institutional capacity. Overall, the chapter highlights the relational foundations of trust in digitally mediated public administration.

Negotiating Trust in Automated Public Services

Banfi, Giulia
2026

Abstract

This chapter examines how citizens and public administrators interpret the growing digitalisation andautomation of public services, focusing on the relationship between digital government and public trust. Drawing on a mixed-methods research design, it combines survey data on citizens’ perceptions with qualitative interviews with civil servants. The findings show that citizens generally support digitalisation, particularly when it simplifies routine procedures and improves accessibility. However, attitudes toward AI-driven automation are more cautious, especially when systems are perceived as replacing human interaction. Trust does not emerge as a direct outcome of technological innovation but is shaped by citizens’ everyday experiences with public services, including usability, procedural clarity, and institutional capacity. Overall, the chapter highlights the relational foundations of trust in digitally mediated public administration.
2026
9798260030486
This chapter examines how citizens and public administrators interpret the growing digitalisation and automation of public services, focusing on the relationship between digital government and public trust. Drawing on a mixed- methods research design, it combines survey data on citizens’ perceptions with qualitative interviews with civil servants. The findings show that citizens generally support digitalisation, particularly when it simplifies routine procedures and improves accessibility. However, attitudes toward AI- driven automation are more cautious, especially when systems are perceived as replacing human interaction. Trust does not emerge as a direct outcome of technological innovation but is shaped by citizens’ everyday experiences with public services, including usability, procedural clarity, and institutional capacity. Overall, the chapter highlights the relational foundations of trust in digitally mediated public administration.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2640517
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact