Although women with disabilities have gained greater visibility in more recent years, it is not unreasonable to argue that they are stillinessential and are among the most at risk of having their rights violated. After briefly recalling the theoretical and political reasons behind their historical inessentiality, the essay identifies the most prevalent sexist and ableist stereotypes and analyzes how they interact. To this aim, it examines two areas where the most serious violations of these women’s rights occur, namely violence and sexual and reproductive health, with particular attention to forced sterilization.
Still Inessential—Women with Disabilities, (Gender) Stereotypes, and Law
Bernardini M. G.
Primo
2026
Abstract
Although women with disabilities have gained greater visibility in more recent years, it is not unreasonable to argue that they are stillinessential and are among the most at risk of having their rights violated. After briefly recalling the theoretical and political reasons behind their historical inessentiality, the essay identifies the most prevalent sexist and ableist stereotypes and analyzes how they interact. To this aim, it examines two areas where the most serious violations of these women’s rights occur, namely violence and sexual and reproductive health, with particular attention to forced sterilization.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BERNARDINI_Condello-Wagner Book Gender Stereotypes.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
589.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
589.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


