This work explores the usefulness of composite indices in the performance measurement of Public Administrations (PAs) following a Public Value (PV) approach. This approach operationalized through the PV “Pyramid” framework and the dimensions therein (impacts, performance, administrative resources), has been institutionalized in Italian PAs through a new performance planning document (named “PIAO”). Moreover, an open issue regards the techniques to be used in the performance measurement. Composite indices seem to be suitable for combining different raw indicators into the unobservable constructs of the PV Pyramid. Few normalization techniques, required for the aggregation, can be reasonably applied: distance from a reference, rescaling, and a mixed approach. An illustrative “toy” example is provided to show the pros and cons of each technique, revealing the applicability of the first normalization technique and the good properties of the third one, even if some limitations remain in terms of meaningfulness.

Measuring Public Value Through Composite Indices: Critical Issues and Preliminary Proposals in the Integrated Planning (PIAO) of Italian Public Administrations

Deidda Gagliardo, Enrico
Primo
;
Ievoli, Riccardo
Penultimo
;
2025

Abstract

This work explores the usefulness of composite indices in the performance measurement of Public Administrations (PAs) following a Public Value (PV) approach. This approach operationalized through the PV “Pyramid” framework and the dimensions therein (impacts, performance, administrative resources), has been institutionalized in Italian PAs through a new performance planning document (named “PIAO”). Moreover, an open issue regards the techniques to be used in the performance measurement. Composite indices seem to be suitable for combining different raw indicators into the unobservable constructs of the PV Pyramid. Few normalization techniques, required for the aggregation, can be reasonably applied: distance from a reference, rescaling, and a mixed approach. An illustrative “toy” example is provided to show the pros and cons of each technique, revealing the applicability of the first normalization technique and the good properties of the third one, even if some limitations remain in terms of meaningfulness.
2025
9783031959943
9783031959950
Public Value, composite indices, normalization, performance planning, Public Administration, PIAO
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Book of short papers SIS 2025 Deidda Gagliardo Dentini Ievoli Mazziotta.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Deidda Gagliardo et al. SIS 2025
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 209.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
209.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2595591.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia: Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 501.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
501.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2595591
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact