According to critical restoration, every restoration intervention is a unique episode, not classifiable into categories, not adhering to predetermined rules, but to be studied each time without assuming dogmatic or preconceived positions. However, one can seek a methodology that can be adopted in the restoration of Cultural Heritage. This contribution attempts to outline a method through the analysis of restorations of three case studies in the city of Ferrara: the monument to Ludovico Ariosto, the Archbishop’s Palace, and the Church of the Conversion of St. Paul. The restoration project and the direction of the works of these three monuments allowed for a reflection both from a technical and theoretical point of view, focusing on the relationship established between the architect and the architectural work through different moments of knowledge, design, and construction. In particular, it is precisely the restoration site that becomes the crucial time and place where the maximum physical proximity to the monument produces an expansion of the architect’s awareness, making the restoration project more conscious. A methodology that does not lead to design choices is not exhausted in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the architectural work but is resolved in aesthetic solutions, rich in meaning.
Secondo il restauro critico, ogni intervento di restauro è un episodio unico, non classificabile in categorie, non conforme a regole prestabilite, ma da studiare ogni volta senza assumere posizioni dogmatiche o preconcette. Tuttavia, si può ricercare una metodologia adottabile nel restauro dei Beni Culturali. Questo contributo tenta di delineare un metodo attraverso l'analisi dei restauri di tre casi studio nella città di Ferrara: il monumento a Ludovico Ariosto, il Palazzo Arcivescovile e la Chiesa della Conversione di San Paolo. Il progetto di restauro e la direzione dei lavori di questi tre monumenti hanno consentito una riflessione sia dal punto di vista tecnico che teorico, focalizzandosi sul rapporto instaurato tra l'architetto e l'opera architettonica attraverso diversi momenti di conoscenza, progettazione e costruzione.
Storia, progetto e cantiere di restauro. Tre casi studio e prime considerazioni fenomenologiche
Benedetta Caglioti
2024
Abstract
According to critical restoration, every restoration intervention is a unique episode, not classifiable into categories, not adhering to predetermined rules, but to be studied each time without assuming dogmatic or preconceived positions. However, one can seek a methodology that can be adopted in the restoration of Cultural Heritage. This contribution attempts to outline a method through the analysis of restorations of three case studies in the city of Ferrara: the monument to Ludovico Ariosto, the Archbishop’s Palace, and the Church of the Conversion of St. Paul. The restoration project and the direction of the works of these three monuments allowed for a reflection both from a technical and theoretical point of view, focusing on the relationship established between the architect and the architectural work through different moments of knowledge, design, and construction. In particular, it is precisely the restoration site that becomes the crucial time and place where the maximum physical proximity to the monument produces an expansion of the architect’s awareness, making the restoration project more conscious. A methodology that does not lead to design choices is not exhausted in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the architectural work but is resolved in aesthetic solutions, rich in meaning.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
STORIA PROGETTO E CANTIERE DI RESTAURO.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Descrizione: versione editoriale
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
2.85 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.85 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


