Current study aims to provide an alternative view of open innovation, entangled and framed within social-collective rationales for its adoption. Thereby, we propose a bandwagon model for open innovation. Our findings confirm that today momentum could be explained by bandwagon behavior. However, the superiority of innovative performance envisaged for the open model is a fact solidly confirmed by empirical evidence. These results clarify that, for once, practice and academia are aligned. Consistently with the social-collective logic, «the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants» (Chesbrough 2017, p. 35).
Are we really open for innovation?
Orlando Beatrice
2018
Abstract
Current study aims to provide an alternative view of open innovation, entangled and framed within social-collective rationales for its adoption. Thereby, we propose a bandwagon model for open innovation. Our findings confirm that today momentum could be explained by bandwagon behavior. However, the superiority of innovative performance envisaged for the open model is a fact solidly confirmed by empirical evidence. These results clarify that, for once, practice and academia are aligned. Consistently with the social-collective logic, «the future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants» (Chesbrough 2017, p. 35).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
mOno are we really.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Full text (versione editoriale)
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
678.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
678.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.