The dissertation builds on a series of judgments according to which, under articles 1241 ff. of the Italian Civil Code, set-off can only be effected in respect of obligations arising out of distinct legal relationships or in respect of obligations which are not reciprocal (synallagmatic) in nature. When these situations arise, e.g. when the obligations in question relate to one and the same contract, or when, in a bilateral contract, the promise of one party is given in consideration of the promise of the other, only a so-called “compensazione impropria” (apparent set-off) occurs: the latter is a mere ascertainment of the underlying respective obligations, thereby falling outside of the scope of articles 1241 ff. of the Civil Code. By analysing the judgments concerning issues of “compensazione impropria”, the survey provides an account of the practical and legal implications of this institution. A comparative study is carried out for this purpose with the French and German legal systems, namely as regards the compensation des dettes connexes and Anrechnung. The aim of the comparison is to determine how the three legal systems deal with the same practical needs and to what extent the solutions adopted in each of these countries bear similar or common features. In the final part of the thesis, the problem is considered of whether a sound dogmatic and systemic justification exists, under the Italian legal system, for the so-called “compensazione impropria”.

La c.d. compensazione impropria ovvero la compensazione c.d. impropria

GABASSI, Giulia
2013

Abstract

The dissertation builds on a series of judgments according to which, under articles 1241 ff. of the Italian Civil Code, set-off can only be effected in respect of obligations arising out of distinct legal relationships or in respect of obligations which are not reciprocal (synallagmatic) in nature. When these situations arise, e.g. when the obligations in question relate to one and the same contract, or when, in a bilateral contract, the promise of one party is given in consideration of the promise of the other, only a so-called “compensazione impropria” (apparent set-off) occurs: the latter is a mere ascertainment of the underlying respective obligations, thereby falling outside of the scope of articles 1241 ff. of the Civil Code. By analysing the judgments concerning issues of “compensazione impropria”, the survey provides an account of the practical and legal implications of this institution. A comparative study is carried out for this purpose with the French and German legal systems, namely as regards the compensation des dettes connexes and Anrechnung. The aim of the comparison is to determine how the three legal systems deal with the same practical needs and to what extent the solutions adopted in each of these countries bear similar or common features. In the final part of the thesis, the problem is considered of whether a sound dogmatic and systemic justification exists, under the Italian legal system, for the so-called “compensazione impropria”.
DE CRISTOFARO, Giovanni
NEGRI, Daniele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
778.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Tesi di dottorato
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 2.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.14 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in SFERA sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11392/2389471
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact